Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17920544›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2007

Interferon-beta treatment for multiple sclerosis.

Robert A Bermel, Richard A Rudick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Rapid exacerbation of multiple sclerosis following the initiation of interferon-β: report of nine cases.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2011
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Current status and challenges of cytokine pharmacology.British journal of pharmacology · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert A BermelDepartment of Neurology, Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
Richard A Rudick

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the leading nontraumatic cause of neurologic disability in young adults. Interferon-beta, approved for use in 1993, was the first treatment to modify the course and prognosis of the disease and remains a mainstay of MS treatment. Numerous large-scale clinical trials in early, active patient populations have established the clinical efficacy of interferon-beta in reducing relapses and delaying disability progression. Although its mechanism of action remains incompletely understood, a reduction in active lesions seen on magnetic resonance imaging implies primary anti-inflammatory properties, a mechanism supported by basic immunologic research. Variation in individual patient responsiveness to interferon-beta may be due to disease variability or differential induction of interferon-stimulated genes. The magnitude of the therapeutic effect appears to be similar among products, but the optimal dose, route, and frequency of administration of the drug remain uncertain.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHumansImmunologic FactorsInterferon-betaMultiple SclerosisImmunologic FactorsInterferon-beta

Identifiers

PMID17920544
PMCPMC7479675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.