Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17920541›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2007

MRI in multiple sclerosis: what's inside the toolbox?

Mohit Neema, James Stankiewicz, Ashish Arora, Zachary D Guss, Rohit Bakshi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The treatment of multiple sclerosis with inosine.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2009
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohit NeemaDepartment of Neurology, Center for Neurological Imaging, Partners MS Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
James Stankiewicz
Ashish Arora
Zachary D Guss
Rohit Bakshi
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

MRI T2 shortening ('blackT2') in multiple sclerosisK23NS042379 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI BAKSHI, ROHIT · 2001 to 2003
$375k
NINDS NIH HHS 1 K23 NS42379-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has played a central role in the diagnosis and management of multiple sclerosis (MS). In addition, MRI metrics have become key supportive outcome measures to explore drug efficacy in clinical trials. Conventional MRI measures have contributed to the understanding of MS pathophysiology at the macroscopic level yet have failed to provide a complete picture of underlying MS pathology. They also show relatively weak relationships to clinical status such as predictive strength for clinical progression. Advanced quantitative MRI measures such as magnetization transfer, spectroscopy, diffusion imaging, and relaxometry techniques are somewhat more specific and sensitive for underlying pathology. These measures are particularly useful in revealing diffuse damage in cerebral white and gray matter and therefore may help resolve the dissociation between clinical and conventional MRI findings. In this article, we provide an overview of the array of tools available with brain and spinal cord MRI technology as it is applied to MS. We review the most recent data regarding the role of conventional and advanced MRI techniques in the assessment of MS. We focus on the most relevant pathologic and clinical correlation studies relevant to these measures.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierBrainHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple Sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID17920541
PMCPMC7479680
OpenAlexW2063773080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.