Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17919464›Full record

ArticleBrain research2008

Negative regulation of Vsx1 by its paralog Chx10/Vsx2 is conserved in the vertebrate retina.

Anna M Clark, Sanghee Yun, Eric S Veien, Yuan Y Wu, Robert L Chow, Richard I Dorsky, Edward M Levine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Microphthalmia and disrupted retinal development due to abioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Mutation ofeLife · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Simultaneous deletion ofDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. eLife · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna M ClarkDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Sanghee Yun
Eric S Veien
Yuan Y Wu
Robert L Chow
Richard I Dorsky
Edward M Levine
University of Utah · USAllen Institute for Brain Science · USUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

University of Utah, Core Vision Research GrantP30EY014800 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Behrad Noudoost · 2005 to 2026
$14.6M
Vsx2 Dependent Regulation of Retinal Progenitor Cell PropertiesR01EY013760 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LEVINE, EDWARD M · 2003 to 2024
$6.9M
Tcf Function in Spinal Cord PatterningR01NS053897 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI DORSKY, RICHARD I · 2006 to 2009
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS EY0014800NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014800NEI NIH HHS R01-EY0013760NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013760NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS0053897NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS053897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chx10/Vsx2 and Vsx1 are the only Paired-like CVC (Prd-L:CVC) homeobox genes in the mouse genome. Both are expressed in the retina and have important but distinct roles in retinal development. Mutations in Chx10/Vsx2 cause reduced retinal progenitor cell (RPC) proliferation and an absence of bipolar cells, while mutations in Vsx1 impair differentiation of cone bipolar cells. Given their structural similarities and importance in retinal development, we sought to determine if a regulatory interaction exists between these genes and whether inactivation of both genes blocks initiation of retinal development. We found that Chx10/Vsx2 binds to a specific sequence in the Vsx1 5'-intergenic region and represses the activity of a luciferase reporter under the control of the Vsx1 promoter. This is consistent with our observation that there is an inverse relationship between the levels of Chx10/Vsx2 and Vsx1 immunostaining within the bipolar cell class. Furthermore, Vsx1 mRNA is upregulated in the RPCs of Chx10/Vsx2 deficient mice and zebrafish embryos injected with a chx10/vsx2 morpholino. In mice deficient for both Chx10/Vsx2 and Vsx1 and zebrafish embryos co-injected with chx10/Vsx2 and vsx1 morpholinos, the changes in embryonic retinal development and marker expression are similar in magnitude to embryos with Chx10/Vsx2 loss of function only. From these studies, we propose that Vsx1 is a direct target of Chx10/Vsx2-mediated transcriptional repression. Although Vsx1 mRNA is upregulated in Chx10/Vsx2 deficient RPCs, Vsx1 does not genetically compensate for loss of Chx10/Vsx2, demonstrating that Prd-L:CVC genes, although important, are not absolutely required to initiate retinal development.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineConserved SequenceDown-RegulationEvolution, MolecularEye ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenes, HomeoboxHomeodomain ProteinsHumansMiceMice, KnockoutPromoter Regions, GeneticRegulatory Elements, TranscriptionalRepressor ProteinsEye ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsRepressor ProteinsRNA, MessengerTranscription FactorsVsx1 protein, mouseVsx2 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID17919464
PMCPMC3315787
OpenAlexW2047582652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.