ArticleMaternal and child health journal2008
Perceptions of prenatal testing for birth defects among rural Latinas.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Latinx attitudes, barriers, and experiences with genetic counseling and testing: A systematic review.Journal of genetic counseling · 2023Pooled it
- Immigrant women's perspective on prenatal and postpartum care: systematic review.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2015Pooled it
- Mental models about heredity among immigrant Latinx adults with limited education from Mexico and Central America.Journal of genetic counseling · 2022Article
- Latinx individuals' knowledge of, preferences for, and experiences with prenatal genetic testing: a scoping review.Reproductive health · 2022Article
- Pregnant Hispanic women's views and knowledge of prenatal genetic testing.Journal of genetic counseling · 2021Article
- Fatalistic Beliefs and Migration Behaviors: A Study of Ideational Demography in Nepal.Population research and policy review · 2020Article
- Is preparation a good reason for prenatal genetic testing? Ethical and critical questions.Birth defects research · 2020Article
- "He Beat You in the Blood": Knowledge and Beliefs About the Transmission of Traits Among Latinos from Mexico and Central America.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2017Article
- Spanish- and English-Speaking Pregnant Women's Views on cfDNA and Other Prenatal Screening: Practical and Ethical Reflections.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- Birth defects, causal attributions, and ethnicity in the national birth defects prevention study.Journal of genetic counseling · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives To examine rural Latinas' understandings of prenatal testing, birth defects, and risk in the context of their expanded AFP (XAFP) screening decisions. Design We conducted a qualitative study using data from in-depth interviews with 33 Latina women receiving prenatal care at three clinic sites in rural areas of California. We analyzed qualitative data by identifying themes that emerged during iterative transcript readings. Quantitative data was used to generate descriptive summary statistics. Results The majority of the participants had not completed high school and had low levels of acculturation. Women in our study tended to view XAFP screening as a routine component of prenatal care that was important for the "health of the baby." Reasons for accepting the XAFP test included reassurance, emotional preparation, and desire for information. Misconceptions included a belief that a normal screening result provides a guarantee of the fetus's health. Generally, participants indicated that, regardless of the screening results, they would not undergo amniocentesis because of the potential miscarriage risk nor would they terminate a pregnancy if their fetus was found to have a chromosome problem. Numerous specific beliefs that differ substantially from medical models regarding birth defects were articulated. Conclusions XAFP screening decisions among rural Latinas are sometimes based on misconceptions of the meaning of test results and the risks associated with undergoing or foregoing testing, and therefore are frequently incongruent with personal testing philosophies and values. Educational efforts and counseling should include clear communication regarding the goals of prenatal screening programs to help these women make informed testing decisions that are reflective of their values and preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.