Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17917503›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2007

Efficacy and safety of darusentan in patients with resistant hypertension: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-ranging study.

Henry R Black, George L Bakris, Michael A Weber, Robert Weiss, Mahfouz El Shahawy, Richard Marple, Georges Tannoury, Stuart Linas, Brian L Wiens, Jennifer V Linseman and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Resistant Hypertension: A Brief Review of Pathophysiology.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Aprocitentan: New insights.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Circulating Levels of Endothelin-1 and Big Endothelin-1 in Patients with Essential Hypertension.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Endothelin.Pharmacological reviews · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Resistant hypertension workup and approach to treatment.International journal of hypertension · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Henry R BlackNew York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA. hrbmd63@gmail.com
George L Bakris
Michael A Weber
Robert Weiss
Mahfouz El Shahawy
Richard Marple
Georges Tannoury
Stuart Linas
Brian L Wiens
Jennifer V Linseman
Robert Roden
Michael J Gerber
Clinical Research Consultants (United States) · USMaine Research Associates · USNew York University · USSarasota University · USState University of New York · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled forced dose-titration study, 115 patients with resistant hypertension, receiving background therapy with >/=3 antihypertensive medications including a diuretic at full doses, were randomized 2:1 to increasing doses of darusentan (10, 50, 100, 150, and 300 mg), a selective endothelin receptor antagonist, or matching placebo once daily for 10 weeks. Darusentan treatment decreased mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels in a dose-dependent fashion compared with placebo; the largest reductions were observed at week 10 (300-mg dose) (systolic, -11.5+/-3.1 mm Hg [P=.015;] diastolic, -6.3+/-2.0 mm Hg [P=.002]). Darusentan (300 mg) also decreased mean 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime ambulatory blood pressures from baseline to week 10. Darusentan was generally well tolerated; mild to moderate edema and headache were the most common adverse events. This study demonstrates a clinical benefit from a new class of antihypertensive agent in patients classified as resistant by the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure guidelines.

Indexed as

Endothelin Receptor AntagonistsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersDiureticsDouble-Blind MethodDrug ResistanceDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHypertensionAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersdarusentanDiureticsEndothelin Receptor AntagonistsPhenylpropionatesPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID17917503
PMCPMC8110158
OpenAlexW2001842786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.