Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17917014›Full record

ArticleImmunologic research2007

Immunodeficiency, radiosensitivity, and the XCIND syndrome.

Richard A Gatti, Elena Boder, Robert A Good

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Immunologic research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Identification of ATIC as a Novel Target for Chemoradiosensitization.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Assessing 'radiosensitivity' with kinetic profiles of γ-H2AX, 53BP1 and BRCA1 foci.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2011
    Article
  9. Clinical radiation sensitivity with DNA repair disorders: an overview.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2009
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richard A GattiDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, UCLA David Geffin School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1732, USA. rgatti@mednet.ucla.edu
Elena Boder
Robert A Good

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Through the analysis of a rare disorder called ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T), many important biological lessons have been gleaned. Today, it is clear that the underlying defect of A-T lies in the nucleus, as an inability to repair or process double strand breaks. More important, by the A-T phenotype now allows us to appreciate a much more general distinction between immunodeficiencies that are radiosensitive and those that are not.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedAtaxia TelangiectasiaChromosomes, Human, Pair 14Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7HumansImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesNeoplasmsNervous System MalformationsRadiation ToleranceSyndromeTranslocation, Genetic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.