Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17916811›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2007

Amateur boxing and risk of chronic traumatic brain injury: systematic review of observational studies.

Mike Loosemore, Charles H Knowles, Greg P Whyte

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Pathophysiology of Concussion.Current pain and headache reports · 2016
    Review
  15. Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy and Movement Disorders: Update.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mike LoosemoreEnglish Institute of Sport, London Region, Olympic Medical Institute, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow HA1 3UJ. mike.loosemore@eis2win.co.uk
Charles H Knowles
Greg P Whyte
Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBLiverpool John Moores University · GBNorthwick Park Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the risk of chronic traumatic brain injury from amateur boxing.

settingSecondary research performed by combination of sport physicians and clinical academics. DESIGN, DATA SOURCES, AND

methodsSystematic review of observational studies in which chronic traumatic brain injury was defined as any abnormality on clinical neurological examination, psychometric testing, neuroimaging studies, and electroencephalography. Studies were identified through database (1950 to date) and bibliographic searches without language restrictions. Two reviewers extracted study characteristics, quality, and data, with adherence to a protocol developed from a widely recommended method for systematic review of observational studies (MOOSE).

results36 papers had relevant extractable data (from a detailed evaluation of 93 studies of 943 identified from the initial search). Quality of evidence was generally poor. The best quality studies were those with a cohort design and those that used psychometric tests. These yielded the most negative results: only four of 17 (24%) better quality studies found any indication of chronic traumatic brain injury in a minority of boxers studied.

conclusionThere is no strong evidence to associate chronic traumatic brain injury with amateur boxing.

Indexed as

BoxingBrain Injury, ChronicDiagnostic ImagingEpidemiologic MethodsHumansPhysical ExaminationPrognosisPsychometricsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID17916811
PMCPMC2034739
OpenAlexW1972610444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.