ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2007
Diagnosing early ankylosing spondylitis.
Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations of blood cell indices with the risk of ankylosing spondylitis: A retrospective case-control and machine learning modeling study.SAGE open medicine · 2026Article
- Epidemiologic Trends and Socioeconomic Disparities of Ankylosing Spondylitis in South Korea: A Nationwide Population-Based Study, 2010-2021.Yonsei medical journal · 2024Article
- Patient-reported impact of spondyloarthritis on work disability and working life: the ATLANTIS survey.Arthritis research & therapy · 2016Article
- Ankylosing spondylitis: A state of the art factual backbone.World journal of radiology · 2015Review
- Current concept of spondyloarthritis: special emphasis on early referral and diagnosis.Current rheumatology reports · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis is still delayed by many years. Several efforts have been made in the past few years to shorten this delay. A new set of criteria for inflammatory back pain has performed better than previous sets. MRI has evolved to become the standard imaging modality for the detection of sacroiliitis during early disease, and it clearly outperforms quantitative scintigraphy, which was the standard screening test for many years. Promising new developments such as whole body MRI and ultrasound (sonography) for the detection of enthesitis or sacroiliitis deserve further evaluation. Serum antibodies directed against a 28-kD Drosophila antigen may provide additional diagnostic information. A recently proposed diagnostic algorithm in patients with suspected early ankylosing spondylitis may help physicians confidently diagnose patients before definite radiographic sacroiliitis is detectable. Finally, referral strategies for patients seen by primary care physicians seem to work well and are currently under further valuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.