Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17913772›Full record

ArticleQuality & safety in health care2007

Intensivist physician staffing and the process of care in academic medical centres.

Jeremy M Kahn, Helga Brake, Kenneth P Steinberg

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Quality & safety in health care, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01413009 (Awakening-Breathing Coordination, Delirium Monitoring/Management & Early Mobility), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01413009 completednot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

Awakening-Breathing Coordination, Delirium Monitoring/Management & Early Mobility (ABCDE) Protocol

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of NebraskaRan2010 to 2013Enrolled200ConditionsICU Delirium, Immobility
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cardiac Critical Care: The Evolution of a Novel Subspecialty.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeremy M KahnDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. jkahn@cceb.med.upenn.edu
Helga Brake
Kenneth P Steinberg

Funding

Development of instrument--critical care organizationK23HL082650 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KAHN, JEREMY M · 2006 to 2010
$576k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL082650NHLBI NIH HHS K23HL082650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough intensivist physician staffing is associated with improved outcomes in critical care, little is known about the mechanism leading to this observation.

objectiveTo determine the relationship between intensivist staffing and select process-based quality indicators in the intensive care unit. RESEARCH

designRetrospective cohort study in 29 academic hospitals participating in the University HealthSystem Consortium Mechanically Ventilated Patient Bundle Benchmarking Project. PATIENTS: 861 adult patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit.

resultsPatient-level information on physician staffing and process-of-care quality indicators were collected on day 4 of mechanical ventilation. By day 4, 668 patients received care under a high intensity staffing model (primary intensivist care or mandatory consult) and 193 patients received care under a low intensity staffing model (optional consultation or no intensivist). Among eligible patients, those receiving care under a high intensity staffing model were more likely to receive prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis (risk ratio 1.08, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.17), stress ulcer prophylaxis (risk ratio 1.10, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.18), a spontaneous breathing trial (risk ratio 1.37, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.94), interruption of sedation (risk ratio 1.64, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.38) and intensive insulin treatment (risk ratio 1.40, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.79) on day 4 of mechanical ventilation. Models accounting for clustering by hospital produced similar estimates of the staffing effect, except for prophylaxis against thrombosis and stress ulcers.

conclusionsHigh intensity physician staffing is associated with increased use of evidence-based quality indicators in patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

Indexed as

Critical CareIntensive Care UnitsPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingProcess Assessment, Health CareQuality Indicators, Health CareRespiration, ArtificialBenchmarkingChemopreventionCohort StudiesEvidence-Based MedicineHospital MortalityHospitals, UniversityHumansInsulinModels, OrganizationalPressure UlcerInsulin

Identifiers

PMID17913772
PMCPMC2464974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.