Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17912367›Full record

ArticlePloS one2007

Effect of cellular quiescence on the success of targeted CML therapy.

Natalia L Komarova, Dominik Wodarz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Molecular Mechanisms of Resistance to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Long-term treatment effects in chronic myeloid leukemia.Journal of mathematical biology · 2017
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evolution of acquired resistance to anti-cancer therapy.Journal of theoretical biology · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalia L KomarovaDepartment of Mathematics, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.
Dominik Wodarz
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Mathematical Models of Programmed CTL ProliferationR01AI058153 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI WODARZ, DOMINIK F · 2005 to 2009
$530k
NIAID NIH HHS 1R01AI058153-01A2NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI058153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimilar to tissue stem cells, primitive tumor cells in chronic myelogenous leukemia have been observed to undergo quiescence; that is, the cells can temporarily stop dividing. Using mathematical models, we investigate the effect of cellular quiescence on the outcome of therapy with targeted small molecule inhibitors. METHODS AND

resultsAccording to the models, the initiation of treatment can result in different patterns of tumor cell decline: a biphasic decline, a one-phase decline, and a reverse biphasic decline. A biphasic decline involves a fast initial phase (which roughly corresponds to the eradication of cycling cells by the drug), followed by a second and slower phase of exponential decline (corresponding to awakening and death of quiescent cells), which helps explain clinical data. We define the time when the switch to the second phase occurs, and identify parameters that determine whether therapy can drive the tumor extinct in a reasonable period of time or not. We further ask how cellular quiescence affects the evolution of drug resistance. We find that it has no effect on the probability that resistant mutants exist before therapy if treatment occurs with a single drug, but that quiescence increases the probability of having resistant mutants if patients are treated with a combination of two or more drugs with different targets. Interestingly, while quiescence prolongs the time until therapy reduces the number of cells to low levels or extinction, the therapy phase is irrelevant for the evolution of drug resistant mutants. If treatment fails as a result of resistance, the mutants will have evolved during the tumor growth phase, before the start of therapy. Thus, prevention of resistance is not promoted by reducing the quiescent cell population during therapy (e.g., by a combination of cell activation and drug-mediated killing).

conclusionsThe mathematical models provide insights into the effect of quiescence on the basic kinetics of the response to targeted treatment of CML. They identify determinants of success in the absence of drug resistant mutants, and elucidate how quiescence influences the emergence of drug resistant mutants.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesCombined Modality TherapyHumansImatinib MesylateLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMedical OncologyModels, BiologicalModels, TheoreticalMutationPiperazinesProbabilityPyrimidinesStochastic ProcessesAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesImatinib MesylatePiperazinesPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID17912367
PMCPMC1991595
OpenAlexW2081834615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.