ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2007
A mechanobiochemical mechanism for monooriented chromosome oscillation in mitosis.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A fine balance among key biophysical factors is required for recovery of bipolar mitotic spindle from monopolar and multipolar abnormalities.Molecular biology of the cell · 2023Article
- Dynamic Instability from Non-equilibrium Structural Transitions on the Energy Landscape of Microtubule.Cell systems · 2020Article
- NuSAP governs chromosome oscillation by facilitating the Kid-generated polar ejection force.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Cell size modulates oscillation, positioning and length of mitotic spindles.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Meiosis-I in Mesostoma ehrenbergii spermatocytes includes distance segregation and inter-polar movements of univalents, and vigorous oscillations of bivalents.Protoplasma · 2014Article
- Springs, clutches and motors: driving forward kinetochore mechanism by modelling.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2011Review
- Stochastic simulation and graphic visualization of mitotic processes.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2010Article
- A quantitative systems view of the spindle assembly checkpoint.The EMBO journal · 2009Review
- An integrated mechanobiochemical feedback mechanism describes chromosome motility from prometaphase to anaphase in mitosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008Article
- Force-generation and dynamic instability of microtubule bundles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008Article
- Microtubule assembly dynamics: new insights at the nanoscale.Current opinion in cell biology · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During mitosis, the condensed chromosomes undergo a series of spectacular oscillations after they are captured in an end-on manner by kinetochore microtubules (KMT) emanating from the spindle poles. Such oscillations are commonly attributed to tug-of-war-like mechanisms, where the mechanical force imbalance alone drives the chromosome movement. However, a large portion of the force imbalance upon the chromosome is absorbed by the kinetochore and may not drive chromosome movement directly. Mounting evidence suggests that such resistance by the kinetochores regulates the chemical reactions of KMT plus-end growth and shrinkage, which have been shown as the determinant of the chromosome antipoleward (AP) and poleward movements. Here we incorporate this important regulatory feature, propose a mechanobiochemical feedback mechanism, and apply it to the monooriented chromosome oscillation, the early stage of the series of observed chromosome oscillations. In this model, the mechanical movement of the chromosome and the local biochemical reactions at the attached kinetochore region form a feedback loop that drives the oscillation. The force imbalance exerted on the chromosomes provides a bias (via mechanically sensitive proteins) on the local biochemical reactions controlling the KMT plus-end dynamics, and the movement of the chromosome in turn changes the forces exerted on it through the experimentally supported gradient in AP force. The proposed feedback mechanism can generate oscillatory behavior that depends on the topology of the feedback loop but is largely independent of the detailed molecular mechanism. We suggest potential molecular players, whose perturbation may allow direct experimental tests of the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.