ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2007
Addressing uncertainties about the effects of treatments offered to NHS patients: whose responsibility?
Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Political Sociology of NICE: Investigating Pharmaceutical Cost-Effectiveness Regulation in the UK.Sociology of health & illness · 2025Article
- "A waste of time without patients": The views of patient representatives attending a workshop in evidence-based practice.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2018Article
- Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management.Lancet (London, England) · 2014Article
- Tackling treatment uncertainties together: the evolution of the James Lind Initiative, 2003-2013.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2013Article
- Embedding clinical trials in clinical practice: Harvesting experience and winnowing evidence.Indian journal of pharmacology · 2010Article
- Access with evidence development in the UK: past experience, current initiatives and future potential.PharmacoEconomics · 2010Article
- Using comparative effectiveness research to inform policy and practice in the UK HHS: past, present and future.PharmacoEconomics · 2010Review
- Funding a clinical trial: the perspective of a medicines funder.PharmacoEconomics · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.