ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2007
Resting mechanomyography before and after resistance exercise.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mechanomyogram for muscle function assessment: a review.PloS one · 2013Pooled it
- Acute circulatory and femoral hemodynamic responses induced by standing core exercise at different rotational cadence: a crossover study.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Unilateral fatiguing exercise and its effect on ipsilateral and contralateral resting mechanomyographic mean frequency between aerobic populations.Physiological reports · 2017Article
- Examination of a neural cross-over effect using resting mechanomyographic mean frequency from the vastus lateralis muscle in different resting positions following aerobic exercise.European journal of applied physiology · 2016Article
- Effects of spinal anesthesia on resting metabolic rate and quadriceps mechanomyography.European journal of applied physiology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A number of mechanisms have been proposed to explain the elevation in oxygen consumption following exercise. Biochemical processes that return muscle to its pre-exercise state do not account for all of the extra oxygen consumed after exercise (excess post-exercise oxygen consumption, EPOC). Muscle at rest after aerobic exercise produces mechanomyographic (MMG) activity of increased amplitude, compared to the pre-exercise state, which declines exponentially with the same time constant as EPOC. The purpose of this study was to determine how the resting MMG is affected by resistance exercise, and whether any change is related to oxygen consumption (VO(2)). Ten young male subjects (22.9 years) performed 30 min of resistance exercise consisting of one set of 10 repetitions at 50% 1-repetition maximum (1-RM) followed by five sets of eight repetitions at 75% of 1-RM for leg press and leg (knee) extension, with 1 min rest between sets. Oxygen consumption was measured by indirect calorimetry, MMG by an accelerometer placed over the rectus femoris, and surface electromyogram (EMG) with electrodes placed distal to the accelerometer. Recordings were made before exercise and for 5.5 h after exercise. MMG activity, expressed as mean absolute acceleration, was significantly elevated after exercise (P = 0.0006), as was EMG activity expressed as root-mean-square voltage (P = 0.03). MMG and VO(2) demonstrated exponential decay after exercise with similar time constants of 7.5 +/- 2.2 and 7.2 +/- 1.0 min, respectively. We conclude that resting muscle is more mechanically active following resistance exercise and that this may contribute to an elevated VO(2).
Indexed as
Identifiers
17909840What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.