Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17907768›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2007

Advanced pharmacokinetic models based on organ clearance, circulatory, and fractal concepts.

K Sandy Pang, Michael Weiss, Panos Macheras

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Process and System Clearances in Pharmacokinetic Models: Our Basic Clearance Concepts Are Correct.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Reproducible pharmacokinetics.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Drug Transporters in Xenobiotic Disposition and Pharmacokinetic Prediction.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The virtual cell based assay: Current status and future perspectives.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

K Sandy PangLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3M2. ks.pang@utoronto.ca
Michael Weiss
Panos Macheras

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three advanced models of pharmacokinetics are described. In the first class are physiologically based pharmacokinetic models based on in vitro data on transport and metabolism. The information is translated as transporter and enzyme activities and their attendant heterogeneities into liver and intestine models. Second are circulatory models based on transit time distribution and plasma concentration time curves. The third are fractal models for nonhomogeneous systems and non-Fickian processes are presented. The usefulness of these pharmacokinetic models, with examples, is compared.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPharmacokineticsAnimalsBlood CirculationHumansMetabolic Clearance RateOrgan SpecificityPharmaceutical PreparationsTissue DistributionPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID17907768
PMCPMC2751417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.