Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17906939›Full record

ReviewPharmacy world & science : PWS2008

Minimising treatment-associated risks in systemic cancer therapy.

Ulrich Jaehde, Andrea Liekweg, Sven Simons, Martina Westfeld

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacy world & science : PWS, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Recommendations by the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy, the Spanish Society of Oncology Nursing and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology for the safe management of antineoplastic medication in cancer patients.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ulrich JaehdeInstitute of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitaet Bonn, An der Immenburg 4, 53121 Bonn, Germany. u.jaehde@uni-bonn.de
Andrea Liekweg
Sven Simons
Martina Westfeld

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aim of the reviewTo review the consequences of drug-related problems (DRP) in systemic cancer therapy and identify specific contributions of the pharmacist to minimise treatment-associated risks.

methodSearches in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were conducted. Bibliographies of retrieved articles were examined for additional references. Only papers in English between 1980 and 2007 were included.

resultsIn systemic cancer therapy there is an enormous potential for DRP due to the high toxicity and the complexity of most therapeutic regimens. The most frequently reported DRP can be classified into adverse effects, drug-drug interactions, medication errors, and non-adherence. Pharmacists have enhanced efforts to assure quality and safety in systemic cancer therapy together with other health care providers. In consequence, oncology pharmacy has evolved as a novel specialist discipline. The endeavour to merge and co-ordinate individual activities and services of the pharmacist has led to pharmaceutical care concepts which aim at offering novel solutions to the various DRP.

conclusionPharmaceutical care for cancer patients should be developed within research projects and integrated into disease management programs in order to ensure broad implementation.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDrug InteractionsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationMedication ErrorsNeoplasmsOncology Service, HospitalPharmaceutical ServicesPharmacistsPharmacy Service, HospitalTreatment Refusal

Identifiers

PMID17906939
PMCPMC2253652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.