ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2008
Design and validation of a low density array (Nosochip) for the detection and identification of the main pathogenic bacteria and fungi responsible for nosocomial pneumonia.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a DNA microarray assay for rapid detection of fifteen bacterial pathogens in pneumonia.BMC microbiology · 2020Article
- Detection of microbial DNAemia: does it matter for sepsis management?Intensive care medicine · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to be able to amplify and to detect on one array 27 different etiologic agents found in nosocomial pneumonia, some being phylogenetically closely related and others very distant. The assay is based on the use of consensus primers combined with the identification of the resulting amplicons by hybridization on specific capture probes present on an array. Three genes were necessary in order to cover the different pathogens. We took a redundancy of at least two positive spots to confirm the identity of each species. Each probe was present in triplicate on the array. The detection limit was between 10 and 1,000 DNA copies in the assay depending on the bacteria and the probe. The assay was also specific when tested both on reference collection strains corresponding to the 27 species of interest and on 57 other bacterial species of the normal human flora. Accuracy of the assay was assessed on 200 clinical isolates and some polymorphisms were indeed observed for 5 species. Effectiveness of the assay was preliminarily validated on 25 endotracheal aspirates and sputum samples, and the results were in accordance either with the cell culture or with the sequencing. Polybacterial infections were well detected in three samples. The results show that a combination of appropriate polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and redundancy of signals on the array allows specific screening of bacteria belonging to different species and genus and even fungi. The results open the way for a possible molecular detection of bacteria in the clinical diagnostic setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.