Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17899447›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2007

The predictive validity of health-related quality of life measures: mortality in a longitudinal population-based study.

Mark S Kaplan, Jean-Marie Berthelot, David Feeny, Bentson H McFarland, Saeeda Khan, Heather Orpana

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality among survivors of AKI.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2012
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A scoping review on the relations between urban form and health: a focus on Canadian quantitative evidence.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2019
    Article
  17. Midlife Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Women.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Age- and sex-specific Canadian utility norms, based on the 2013-2014 Canadian Community Health Survey.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2018
    Article
  20. Quality of life independently predicts long-term mortality but not vascular events: the Northern Manhattan Study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark S KaplanSchool of Community Health, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207, USA. kaplanm@pdx.edu
Jean-Marie Berthelot
David Feeny
Bentson H McFarland
Saeeda Khan
Heather Orpana

Funding

Longitudinal Analysis of Health-Related Quality of Life in an Aging PopulationR21AG027129 · NIA · PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KAPLAN, MARK S. · 2006 to 2007
$343k
NIA NIH HHS AG 027129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study examined the association between health-related quality of life (HRQL) and mortality risk, and compared the predictive ability of Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) with self-rated health (SRH).

methodsData were from the 1994/95 Canadian National Population Health Survey, consisting of 12,375 women and men aged 18 and older. Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed to estimate mortality risk over eight years.

resultsMortality risks for people reporting good, fair, and poor health at baseline were, respectively, 1.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04, 2.00), 1.97 (1.35, 2.88), and 3.21 (2.08, 4.95) times greater than those who reported excellent health. In a model excluding SRH, the effect of HUI3 on mortality was strong and significant (HR = 0.47; 95%, 0.33, 0.67) when adjusted for possible confounders. When HUI3 and SRH were considered simultaneously, the effect of the HUI3 on mortality was somewhat attenuated, but still significant (HR = 0.61, 0.42, 0.89) after adjusting for potential confounders.

conclusionsAlthough SRH is a modestly stronger predictor of mortality than HUI3, HUI3 adds to the mortality prediction ability of SRH.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaFemaleForecastingHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMortalityProportional Hazards ModelsRisk Assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.