Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17897994›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2007

Working to make an image: an analysis of three Philip Morris corporate image media campaigns.

Glen Szczypka, Melanie A Wakefield, Sherry Emery, Yvonne M Terry-McElrath, Brian R Flay, Frank J Chaloupka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Corporate philanthropy, lobbying, and public health policy.American journal of public health · 2008
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Working to make a disease.Tobacco control · 2007
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Glen SzczypkaThe Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA.
Melanie A Wakefield
Sherry Emery
Yvonne M Terry-McElrath
Brian R Flay
Frank J Chaloupka

Funding

YOUTH SMOKING AND THE MEDIAR01CA086273 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI WAKEFIELD, MELANIE A · 2000 to 2003
$4.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA86273-01NCI NIH HHS R01 CA086273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the nature and timing of, and population exposure to, Philip Morris USA's three explicit corporate image television advertising campaigns and explore the motivations behind each campaign.

methodsAnalysis of television ratings from the largest 75 media markets in the United States, which measure the reach and frequency of population exposure to advertising; copies of all televised commercials produced by Philip Morris; and tobacco industry documents, which provide insights into the specific goals of each campaign.

findingsHousehold exposure to the "Working to Make a Difference: the People of Philip Morris" averaged 5.37 ads/month for 27 months from 1999-2001; the "Tobacco Settlement" campaign averaged 10.05 ads/month for three months in 2000; and "PMUSA" averaged 3.11 ads/month for the last six months in 2003. The percentage of advertising exposure that was purchased in news programming in order to reach opinion leaders increased over the three campaigns from 20%, 39% and 60%, respectively. These public relations campaigns were designed to counter negative images, increase brand recognition, and improve the financial viability of the company.

conclusionsOnly one early media campaign focused on issues other than tobacco, whereas subsequent campaigns have been specifically concerned with tobacco issues, and more targeted to opinion leaders. The size and timing of the advertising buys appeared to be strategically crafted to maximise advertising exposure for these population subgroups during critical threats to Philip Morris's public image.

Indexed as

Public RelationsTelevisionTobacco IndustryAdvertisingHumansMotivationPersuasive CommunicationPublic OpinionUnited States

Identifiers

PMID17897994
PMCPMC2598574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.