Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17896101›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2007

[Multimodal magnetic resonance diagnostics of arteriovenous malformations].

M Essig

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M EssigAbteilung Radiologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. m.essig@dkfz.de
DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arteriovenous malformations (AVM) are complex inborn malformations of the vascular system. In the brain they can lead to severe complications, such as parenchymal haemorrhaging, epileptic seizures or neurologic failure, which necessitates a safe diagnosis and therapy. In addition to conventional angiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MR angiography (MRA) have now been established as the gold standard diagnostic procedures. Using MRA the angioarchitecture of malformations can be captured and with a parallel imaging of the parenchyme the method is very well suited for therapy planning and monitoring. This review summarizes the present day possibilities of multimodal MRT diagnosis of AVM and describes the purely morphologic as well as the physiologic and pathophysiologic characteristics. The various MR angiographic techniques will be firstly described with respect to the basic technical principles and the results obtained so far will be summarized. The principle of functional MRT will be described and the diagnostic possibilities with respect to AVM will be discussed.

Indexed as

HumansImage EnhancementIntracranial Arteriovenous MalformationsMagnetic Resonance ImagingPractice Patterns, Physicians'

Identifiers

PMID17896101
OpenAlexW115864011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.