Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17893382›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Let's not talk about it: suicide inquiry in primary care.

Mitchell D Feldman, Peter Franks, Paul R Duberstein, Steven Vannoy, Ronald Epstein, Richard L Kravitz

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Changes in Attitudes and Confidence in the Integration of Psychiatry in Other Areas of Medicine.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mitchell D FeldmanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Calif, USA.
Peter Franks
Paul R Duberstein
Steven Vannoy
Ronald Epstein
Richard L Kravitz
University of Rochester · USCalifornia Department of Health Care Services · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Consumer Influences of Treatment of DepressionR01MH064683 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI KRAVITZ, RICHARD L · 2002 to 2004
$2.1M
Improving Care for Comorbid Physical and Mental IllnessK24MH072756 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI KRAVITZ, RICHARD L · 2005 to 2009
$643k
NIMH NIH HHS 5 R01 MH064683NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH072756NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to ascertain physician characteristics associated with exploring suicidality in patients with depressive symptoms and the influence of patient antidepressant requests.

methodsPrimary care physicians were randomly recruited from 4 sites in northern California and Rochester, NY; 152 physicians participated (53%-61% of those approached). Standardized patients portraying 2 conditions (major depression and adjustment disorder) and 3 antidepressant request types (brand specific, general, or none) made unannounced visits to these physicians between May 2003 and May 2004. We examined factors associated with physician exploration of suicidality.

resultsSuicide was explored in 36% of 298 encounters. Exploration was more common when the patient portrayed major depression (vs adjustment disorder) (P = .03), with an antidepressant request (vs no request) (P=.02), in academic settings (P <.01), and among physicians with personal experience with depression (P <.01). The random effects logistic model revealed a significant physician variance component with rho = 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.68) indicating that there were additional, unspecified physician factors determining the tendency to explore suicide risk. These factors are unrelated to physician specialty (family medicine or internal medicine), sex, communication style, or perceived barriers to or confidence in treating depression.

conclusionsWhen seeing patients with depressive symptoms, primary care physicians do not consistently inquire about suicidality. Their inquiries into suicidal thinking may be enhanced through advertising or public service messaging that prompts patients to ask for help. Research is needed to further elucidate physician characteristics associated with the assessment of suicidality.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelSuicide PreventionAntidepressive AgentsDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedPatient SimulationPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID17893382
PMCPMC2000302
OpenAlexW2109603195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.