Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17892578›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2007

Sample matching by inferred agonal stress in gene expression analyses of the brain.

Jun Z Li, Fan Meng, Larisa Tsavaler, Simon J Evans, Prabhakara V Choudary, Hiroaki Tomita, Marquis P Vawter, David Walsh, Vida Shokoohi, Tisha Chung and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The gputools package enables GPU computing in R.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010
    Article
  12. Selection of reference gene expression in a schizophrenia brain cohort.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2010
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jun Z LiStanford Human Genome Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA. junli@shgc.stanford.edu
Fan Meng
Larisa Tsavaler
Simon J Evans
Prabhakara V Choudary
Hiroaki Tomita
Marquis P Vawter
David Walsh
Vida Shokoohi
Tisha Chung
William E Bunney
Edward G Jones
Huda Akil
Stanley J Watson
Richard M Myers
Stanford University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGene expression patterns in the brain are strongly influenced by the severity and duration of physiological stress at the time of death. This agonal effect, if not well controlled, can lead to spurious findings and diminished statistical power in case-control comparisons. While some recent studies match samples by tissue pH and clinically recorded agonal conditions, we found that these indicators were sometimes at odds with observed stress-related gene expression patterns, and that matching by these criteria still sometimes results in identifying case-control differences that are primarily driven by residual agonal effects. This problem is analogous to the one encountered in genetic association studies, where self-reported race and ethnicity are often imprecise proxies for an individual's actual genetic ancestry.

resultsWe developed an Agonal Stress Rating (ASR) system that evaluates each sample's degree of stress based on gene expression data, and used ASRs in post hoc sample matching or covariate analysis. While gene expression patterns are generally correlated across different brain regions, we found strong region-region differences in empirical ASRs in many subjects that likely reflect inter-individual variabilities in local structure or function, resulting in region-specific vulnerability to agonal stress.

conclusionVariation of agonal stress across different brain regions differs between individuals, revealing a new level of complexity for gene expression studies of brain tissues. The Agonal Stress Ratings quantitatively assess each sample's extent of regulatory response to agonal stress, and allow a strong control of this important confounder.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationAlgorithmsBrainCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesDeathHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationLaboratoriesMatched-Pair AnalysisOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPainRNASampling StudiesStress, PhysiologicalRNA

Identifiers

PMID17892578
PMCPMC2213675
OpenAlexW2135460096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.