Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17892558›Full record

ArticleProteome science2007

Quantifying raft proteins in neonatal mouse brain by 'tube-gel' protein digestion label-free shotgun proteomics.

Hongwei Yu, Bassam Wakim, Man Li, Brian Halligan, G Stephen Tint, Shailendra B Patel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteome science, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Proteomic analyses reveal that ginsenoside Rg3(Journal of ginseng research · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Disruption of lipid-raft localized GαNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hongwei Yu *Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nutrition, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Bassam Wakim *Department of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Man LiDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nutrition, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Brian HalliganNational Center for Proteomics Research, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
G Stephen TintResearch Service, Department of Veterans Affairs New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, NJ 07018, USA, and Department of Medicine, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103-2714, USA.
Shailendra B PatelDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nutrition, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Medical College of Wisconsin · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

The Role of Cholesterol in DevelopmentR01HL068660 · NHLBI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI PATEL, SHAILENDRA BHANUBHAI · 2002 to 2005
$1.5M
Brain Lipid Rafts In Cholesterol Biosynthesis DisordersR03HD062938 · NICHD · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI YU, HONGWEI · 2010 to 2011
$123k
NEUTROPHIL AND O2 RADICAL MEDIATED ENDOTHELIAL INJURYR01HL028182 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI REPINE, JOHN E · 1985 to 1987
–
NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HV028182NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL068660NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD062938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe low concentration and highly hydrophobic nature of proteins in lipid raft samples present significant challenges for the sensitive and accurate proteomic analyses of lipid raft proteins. Elimination of highly enriched lipids and interfering substances from raft samples is generally required before mass spectrometric analyses can be performed, but these procedures often lead to excessive protein loss and increased sample variability. For accurate analyses of the raft proteome, simplified protocols are needed to avoid excessive sample handling and purification steps.

resultsWe have devised a simple protocol using a 'tube-gel' protein digestion that, when combined with mass spectrometry, can be used to obtain comprehensive and reproducible identification and quantitation of the lipid raft proteome prepared from neonatal mouse brain. Lipid rafts (detergent-resistant membranes using Triton X-100 extraction) prepared from neonatal mouse brain were directly incorporated into a polyacrylamide tube-gel matrix without prior protein separation. After in-gel digestion of proteins, nanospray LC-MS/MS was used to analyze the extracted peptides, and the resulting spectra were searched to identify the proteins present in the sample. Using the standard 'label-free' proteomics approach, the total number of MS/MS spectra for the identified proteins was used to provide a measure of relative protein abundances. This approach was successfully applied to lipid rafts prepared from neonatal mouse brain. A total of 216 proteins were identified: 127 proteins (58.8%) were predicted to be membrane proteins, or membrane-associated proteins and 175 proteins (~80%) showed less than a 2-fold variation in the relative abundance in replicate samples.

conclusionThe tube-gel protein digestion protocol coupled with nanospray LC-MS/MS (TubeGeLC-MS/MS) offers a simple and reproducible method for identifying and quantifying the changes of relative abundances in lipid raft proteins from neonatal mouse brain and could become a useful approach for studying lipid raft proteins from various tissues.

Identifiers

PMID17892558
PMCPMC2045652
OpenAlexW2113998378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.