Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17891537›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2007

Levocetirizine does not prolong the QT/QTc interval in healthy subjects: results from a thorough QT study.

Réginald Hulhoven, Dominique Rosillon, Michel Letiexhe, Marie-Anne Meeus, Agnès Daoust, Armel Stockis

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Vonoprazan-associated long QT syndrome.Journal of general and family medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Balanced discussion of second-generation antihistamines' data.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. QT prolongation induced by hydroxyzine: a pharmacovigilance case report.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Cardiovascular safety of antihistamines.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2014
    Review
  16. The IQ-CSRC prospective clinical Phase 1 study: "Can early QT assessment using exposure response analysis replace the thorough QT study?".Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2014
    Review
  17. Pharmacology of antihistamines.Indian journal of dermatology · 2013
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Pharmacology of antihistamines.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Réginald HulhovenClinical Pharmacology, UCB Pharma SA, Chemin du Foriest 1420, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium. reginald.hulhoven@ucb-group.com
Dominique Rosillon
Michel Letiexhe
Marie-Anne Meeus
Agnès Daoust
Armel Stockis
UCB Pharma (Belgium) · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo conduct a thorough QT study of levocetirizine, a non-sedating antihistamine, in accordance with International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) E14 guidance.

methodsThe study was designed as a single-dose, placebo and positive-controlled, four-way crossover, randomised trial in which 52 healthy male and female subjects participated. Levocetirizine (5 and 30 mg) and placebo were administered double-blind, and the positive control, moxifloxacin (400 mg), was open-label. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were obtained by continuous Holter monitoring at various time points (three per time point) during a 24-h period at baseline and after each treatment. The ECGs were read centrally in a blinded manner. QT intervals were corrected for heart rate using a gender- and study-specific correction (QTcSS) and Fridericia's correction (QTcF). The largest QTc time-matched and baseline-subtracted difference between each active drug and the placebo (largest delta delta QTcSS) was derived from a mixed-effect analysis of variance.

resultsThe one-sided 95% upper limits of the largest delta delta QTcSS for levocetirizine were 5.7 ms (5 mg) and 3.9 ms (30 mg), with mean estimates of 2.9 and 1.1 ms, respectively. Similar results were obtained for the delta delta QTcF data. Statistically, moxifloxacin significantly lengthened the QTcSS, with a one-sided 95% lower limit of the largest delta delta QTcSS of 10.5 ms and a mean estimate of 13.4 ms. There was no relationship between the measured delta QTcSS and the plasma concentration of levocetirizine, whereas a statistically significant linear relationship was observed with the plasma concentration of moxifloxacin [slope estimate 0.004 ms/(ng/mL); 95% confidence interval: 0.003-0.005].

conclusionsOverall, the results of this thorough QT study indicate that the methodology of the trial was valid and sensitive enough to demonstrate the absence of effect of levocetirizine at both therapeutic (5 mg) and supra-therapeutic (30 mg) doses on cardiac repolarisation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAza CompoundsCetirizineCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodElectrocardiography, AmbulatoryFemaleFluoroquinolonesHeart RateHistamine H1 Antagonists, Non-SedatingHumansLong QT SyndromeMaleMiddle AgedAza CompoundsCetirizineFluoroquinolonesHistamine H1 Antagonists, Non-SedatinglevocetirizineMoxifloxacinPiperazinesQuinolines

Identifiers

PMID17891537
OpenAlexW2052606478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.