Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17891461›Full record

ReviewClinical & experimental metastasis2008

Selectins and selectin ligands in extravasation of cancer cells and organ selectivity of metastasis.

Stéphanie Gout, Pierre-Luc Tremblay, Jacques Huot

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. EarlyFrontiers in oncology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Physicochemical Principles of Adhesion Mechanisms in the Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. A 3D Peptide/[60]Fullerene Hybrid for Multivalent Recognition.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stéphanie GoutLe Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de l'Université Laval, L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, Quebec, Canada. stephanie-gout@aliceadsl.fr
Pierre-Luc Tremblay
Jacques Huot
Université Laval · CAHôtel-Dieu de Québec · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic spreading is a dreadful complication of neoplastic diseases that is responsible for most deaths due to cancer. It consists in the formation of secondary neoplasms from cancer cells that have detached from the primary site. The formation of these secondary sites is not random and several clinical observations indicate that the metastatic colonization exhibits organ selectivity. This organ tropism relies mostly on the complementary adhesive interactions between the cancer cells and their microenvironment. In particular, several lines of evidence suggest that the organ selectivity of colon cancer cells for the liver involves the binding of the circulating cancer cells to endothelial E-selectin. The aim of this review is to make an integrative up-date of the mechanisms that govern the organ selectivity of the metastatic process focusing more especially on the role of selectins and selectin ligands.

Indexed as

Neoplasm MetastasisNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingAnimalsCell AdhesionHumansLigandsOligosaccharidesOrgan SpecificitySelectinsLigandsOligosaccharidesSelectins

Identifiers

PMID17891461
OpenAlexW2083314390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.