ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2007
VO2max during successive maximal efforts.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Trial
- Oxygen uptake kinetics and speed-time correlates of modified 3-minute all-out shuttle running in soccer players.PloS one · 2018Trial
- Effects of verification stage intensity and duration on [Formula: see text] determination.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Assessing maximum oxygen uptake through a motor-cognitive reactive agility test in team ball sports athletes.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- A verification phase adds little value to the determination of maximum oxygen uptake in well-trained adults.European journal of applied physiology · 2024Article
- Acute Oxygen Consumption Response to Fast Start High-Intensity Intermittent Exercise.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The efficacy of a verification stage for determiningSports medicine and health science · 2023Article
- Is the Verification Phase a Suitable Criterion for the Determination of Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction? A Validation Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Incremental and decremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing protocols produce similar maximum oxygen uptake in athletes.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Determining the Optimal Workrate for Cycle Ergometer Verification Phase Testing in Males with Obesity.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Verification Testing to Confirm VOInternational journal of exercise science · 2020Article
- Verification testing to confirm VOThe journal of spinal cord medicine · 2019Article
- Time Course Changes in Confirmed 'True' VOSports medicine international open · 2019Article
- The Effects of Fatiguing Aerobic Exercise on the Cerebral Blood Flow and Oxygen Extraction in the Brain: A Piloting Neuroimaging Study.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Article
- The Maximal Oxygen Uptake Verification Phase: a Light at the End of the Tunnel?Sports medicine - open · 2017Review
- The Reliability and Validity of a Four-Minute Running Time-Trial in Assessing [Formula: see text]max and Performance.Frontiers in physiology · 2017Article
- Graded Exercise Testing Protocols for the Determination of VOJournal of sports medicine (Hindawi Publishing Corporation) · 2016Review
- The Effects of High Intensity Interval Training vs Steady State Training on Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacity.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concept of VO(2)max has been a defining paradigm in exercise physiology for >75 years. Within the last decade, this concept has been both challenged and defended. The purpose of this study was to test the concept of VO(2)max by comparing VO(2) during a second exercise bout following a preliminary maximal effort exercise bout. The study had two parts. In Study #1, physically active non-athletes performed incremental cycle exercise. After 1-min recovery, a second bout was performed at a higher power output. In Study #2, competitive runners performed incremental treadmill exercise and, after 3-min recovery, a second bout at a higher speed. In Study #1 the highest VO(2) (bout 1 vs. bout 2) was not significantly different (3.95 +/- 0.75 vs. 4.06 +/- 0.75 l min(-1)). Maximal heart rate was not different (179 +/- 14 vs. 180 +/- 13 bpm) although maximal V(E) was higher in the second bout (141 +/- 36 vs. 151 +/- 34 l min(-1)). In Study #2 the highest VO(2) (bout 1 vs. bout 2) was not significantly different (4.09 +/- 0.97 vs. 4.03 +/- 1.16 l min(-1)), nor was maximal heart rate (184 + 6 vs. 181 +/- 10 bpm) or maximal V(E) (126 +/- 29 vs. 126 +/- 34 l min(-1)). The results support the concept that the highest VO(2) during a maximal incremental exercise bout is unlikely to change during a subsequent exercise bout, despite higher muscular power output. As such, the results support the "classical" view of VO(2)max.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17891414What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.