Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17891366›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)2008

Pericytes: gatekeepers in tumour cell metastasis?

Holger Gerhardt, Henrik Semb

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Heterogeneity of Colorectal Cancer Progression: Molecular Gas and Brakes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Immunotherapeutic Targeting of Tumor-Associated Blood Vessels.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Non-coding RNAs in cancer brain metastasis.Frontiers in bioscience (Scholar edition) · 2016
    Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Holger GerhardtVascular Biology Laboratory, London Research Institute-Cancer Research UK, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PX, UK. holger.gerhardt@cancer.org.uk
Henrik Semb
Cancer Research UK · GBLund University · SE

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumour cells use two major routes to spread during metastasis, e.g. lymph vessels and blood vessels within or surrounding the primary tumour. The growth rate of the primary tumour often correlates with the quantity of new blood vessels that form within the tumour. However, qualitative abnormalities of the tumour vasculature profoundly affect the perfusion of the primary tumour and the escape of tumour cells into the circulation. In this paper, we review recent evidence for a novel role of the supporting mural cells in limiting blood-borne metastasis.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsBecaplerminCell AdhesionCell MovementEndothelial CellsExtracellular MatrixHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingNeovascularization, PathologicNeural Cell Adhesion MoleculesPericytesAngiogenesis InhibitorsBecaplerminNeural Cell Adhesion MoleculesPlatelet-Derived Growth FactorProto-Oncogene Proteins c-sis

Identifiers

PMID17891366
OpenAlexW2166715150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.