Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17890393›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2008

High-resolution cell surface dynamics of germinating Aspergillus fumigatus conidia.

Etienne Dague, David Alsteens, Jean-Paul Latgé, Yves F Dufrêne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Fungal biofilms in human health and disease.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Solid-state NMR molecular snapshots ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Growth ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Characterization ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. mSphere · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. EphA2-Dependent Internalization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Etienne DagueUnité de Chimie des Interfaces, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
David Alsteens
Jean-Paul Latgé
Yves F Dufrêne

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used real-time atomic force microscopy with a temperature-controlled stage (37 degrees C) to probe the structural and physicochemical dynamics of single Aspergillus fumigatus conidia during germination. Nanoscale topographic images of dormant spores revealed the presence of a layer of rodlets made of hydrophobins, in agreement with earlier electron microscopy observations. Within the 3-h germination period, progressive disruption of the rodlet layer was observed, revealing hydrophilic inner cell wall structures. Using adhesion force mapping with hydrophobic tips, these ultrastructural changes were shown to correlate with major differences in cell surface hydrophobicity. That is, the rodlet surface was uniformly hydrophobic due to the presence of hydrophobins, whereas the cell wall material appearing upon germination was purely hydrophilic. This study illustrates the potential of real-time atomic force microscopy imaging and force spectroscopy for tracking cell-surface dynamics.

Indexed as

Aspergillus fumigatusHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMicroscopy, Atomic ForceSpores, FungalTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID17890393
PMCPMC2157220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.