Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17890368›Full record

ArticleGenetics2007

The dynamics of the roo transposable element in mutation-accumulation lines and segregating populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Montserrat Papaceit, Victoria Avila, Montserrat Aguadé, Aurora García-Dorado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. qPCR as a Selective Tool for Cytogenetics.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  2. Review
  3. A unique cluster ofMobile DNA · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Montserrat PapaceitDepartamento de Genética, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Victoria Avila
Montserrat Aguadé
Aurora García-Dorado

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We estimated the number of copies for the long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposable element roo in a set of long-standing Drosophila melanogaster mutation-accumulation full-sib lines and in two large laboratory populations maintained with effective population size approximately 500, all of them derived from the same isogenic origin. Estimates were based on real-time quantitative PCR and in situ hybridization. Considering previous estimates of roo copy numbers obtained at earlier stages of the experiment, the results imply a strong acceleration of the insertion rate in the accumulation lines. The detected acceleration is consistent with a model where only one (maybe a few) of the approximately 70 roo copies in the ancestral isogenic genome was active and each active copy caused new insertions with a relatively high rate ( approximately 10(-2)), with new inserts being active copies themselves. In the two laboratory populations, however, a stabilized copy number or no accelerated insertion was found. Our estimate of the average deleterious viability effects per accumulated insert [E(s) < 0.003] is too small to account for the latter finding, and we discuss the mechanisms that could contain copy number.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticAnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryChromosomesDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGene DosageGenomeIn Situ HybridizationMaleMutationPolymerase Chain ReactionTerminal Repeat SequencesDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID17890368
PMCPMC2013678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.