Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17889852›Full record

ArticleFEBS letters2007

A neuronal cell-based botulinum neurotoxin assay for highly sensitive and specific detection of neutralizing serum antibodies.

Sabine Pellett, William H Tepp, Colin M Clancy, Gary E Borodic, Eric A Johnson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in FEBS letters, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Substrate cleavage and duration of action of botulinum neurotoxin type FA ("H, HA").Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sabine PellettFood Research Institute, Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, United States.
William H Tepp
Colin M Clancy
Gary E Borodic
Eric A Johnson
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USCambridge Hospital · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN266200400026CPHS HHS HHSN266200400026C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) serotypes A and B are widely used as pharmaceuticals to treat various neurological disorders and in cosmetic applications. The major adverse effect of these treatments has been resistance to treatment after multiple injections. Currently, patients receiving BoNT therapies and patients enrolled in clinical trials for new applications and/or new formulations of BoNTs are not routinely monitored for the formation of neutralizing antibodies, since no assay other than the mouse protection procedure is commercially available that reliably tests for the presence of such antibodies. This report presents a highly sensitive and specific neuronal cell-based assay that provides sensitive and specific detection of neutralizing antibodies to BoNT/A.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBiological AssayBlotting, WesternBotulinum ToxinsBotulinum Toxins, Type AHumansMiceNeuronsNeurotoxinsNeutralization TestsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySpinal CordSynaptosomal-Associated Protein 25Antibodies, BacterialBotulinum ToxinsBotulinum Toxins, Type Abotulinum toxin type ENeurotoxinsrimabotulinumtoxinBSynaptosomal-Associated Protein 25

Identifiers

PMID17889852
PMCPMC2748649
OpenAlexW2166825283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.