Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17888502›Full record

ReviewProgress in biophysics and molecular biology

Multi-scale computational modelling in biology and physiology.

James Southern, Joe Pitt-Francis, Jonathan Whiteley, Daniel Stokeley, Hiromichi Kobashi, Ross Nobes, Yoshimasa Kadooka, David Gavaghan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in biophysics and molecular biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Molecular Crowding by Computational Approaches.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Multiscale modeling meets machine learning: What can we learn?Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

James SouthernFujitsu Laboratories of Europe Ltd, Hayes Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex UB4 8FE, UK. James.Southern@uk.fujitsu.com
Joe Pitt-Francis
Jonathan Whiteley
Daniel Stokeley
Hiromichi Kobashi
Ross Nobes
Yoshimasa Kadooka
David Gavaghan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in biotechnology and the availability of ever more powerful computers have led to the formulation of increasingly complex models at all levels of biology. One of the main aims of systems biology is to couple these together to produce integrated models across multiple spatial scales and physical processes. In this review, we formulate a definition of multi-scale in terms of levels of biological organisation and describe the types of model that are found at each level. Key issues that arise in trying to formulate and solve multi-scale and multi-physics models are considered and examples of how these issues have been addressed are given for two of the more mature fields in computational biology: the molecular dynamics of ion channels and cardiac modelling. As even more complex models are developed over the coming few years, it will be necessary to develop new methods to model them (in particular in coupling across the interface between stochastic and deterministic processes) and new techniques will be required to compute their solutions efficiently on massively parallel computers. We outline how we envisage these developments occurring.

Indexed as

BiologyComputational BiologyModels, BiologicalPhysiologyAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID17888502
PMCPMC7112301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.