ReviewDrugs2007
Vitamin D receptor activator selectivity in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism: understanding the differences among therapies.
Review in Drugs, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paricalcitol in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism and its potential benefits.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Trial
- Extended-release calcifediol in stage 3-4 chronic kidney disease: a new therapy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism associated with hypovitaminosis D.Journal of nephrology · 2022Review
- Medication Safety Principles and Practice in CKD.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2018Review
- Long-Term Therapy Outcomes When Treating Chronic Kidney Disease Patients with Paricalcitol in German and Austrian Clinical Practice (TOP Study).International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Article
- Can the combination of calcium and parathormone levels above K/DOQI guidelines be used as a marker of adynamic bone disease in African Americans?International urology and nephrology · 2011Article
- Combination therapy with paricalcitol and trandolapril reduces renal fibrosis in obstructive nephropathy.Kidney international · 2009Article
- Treatment options of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3 and 4: an historic review.Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases · 2009Article
- Association of oral calcitriol with improved survival in nondialyzed CKD.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2008Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a common and serious consequence of chronic kidney disease (CKD). SHPT is a complex condition characterised by a decline in 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and consequent vitamin D receptor (VDR) activation, abnormalities in serum calcium and phosphorus levels, parathyroid gland hyperplasia, elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion, and systemic mineral and bone abnormalities. There are three classes of drugs used for treatment of SHPT: (i) nonselective VDR activators or agonists (VDRAs); (ii) selective VDRAs; and (iii) calcimimetics. The VDRAs act on the VDR, whereas the calcimimetics act on the calcium-sensing receptor. Calcimimetics are commonly used in conjunction with VDRA therapy. By virtue of the differences in their chemical structure, the nonselective and selective VDRAs differ in their effects on gene expression, and ultimately parathyroid gland, bone and intestine function. Medications in all three classes are effective in suppression of PTH; however, clinical studies show that calcimimetics are associated with an unfavourable tolerability profile and hypocalcaemia, whereas nonselective VDRAs, and to a lesser extent selective VDRAs, are associated with dose-limiting hypercalcaemia and hyperphosphataemia. Selective VDRAs also have minimal undesirable effects on calcium absorption in the intestine, and calcium and phosphorus mobilisation in the bone compared with nonselective VDRAs. Calcium load in patients with CKD can lead to vascular calcification, accelerated progression of cardiovascular disease and increased mortality. High serum phosphorus levels are also associated with adverse effects on cardiorenal function and survival. Recent evidence suggests that VDRAs are associated with a survival benefit in CKD patients, with a more favourable effect with selective VDRAs than nonselective VDRAs. Paricalcitol, a selective VDRA, is reported to exert specific effects on gene expression in various cell types that are involved in vascular calcification and the development of coronary artery disease. This article examines the molecular mechanisms that determine selectivity of VDRAs, and reviews the evidence for clinical efficacy, safety and survival associated with the three drug classes used for treatment of SHPT in CKD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.