Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17883283›Full record

ReviewDrugs2007

Vitamin D receptor activator selectivity in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism: understanding the differences among therapies.

Diego Brancaccio, Jürgen Bommer, Daniel Coyne

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Medication Safety Principles and Practice in CKD.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Treatment options of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3 and 4: an historic review.Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases · 2009
    Article
  8. Association of oral calcitriol with improved survival in nondialyzed CKD.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2008
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Diego BrancaccioRenal Division, Ospedale San Paulo, University of Milan, Via di Rudini 8, 20142 Milan, Italy. diego.brancaccio@tiscalinet.it
Jürgen Bommer
Daniel Coyne
Chirurgische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg · DEUniversity of Milan · ITWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a common and serious consequence of chronic kidney disease (CKD). SHPT is a complex condition characterised by a decline in 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and consequent vitamin D receptor (VDR) activation, abnormalities in serum calcium and phosphorus levels, parathyroid gland hyperplasia, elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion, and systemic mineral and bone abnormalities. There are three classes of drugs used for treatment of SHPT: (i) nonselective VDR activators or agonists (VDRAs); (ii) selective VDRAs; and (iii) calcimimetics. The VDRAs act on the VDR, whereas the calcimimetics act on the calcium-sensing receptor. Calcimimetics are commonly used in conjunction with VDRA therapy. By virtue of the differences in their chemical structure, the nonselective and selective VDRAs differ in their effects on gene expression, and ultimately parathyroid gland, bone and intestine function. Medications in all three classes are effective in suppression of PTH; however, clinical studies show that calcimimetics are associated with an unfavourable tolerability profile and hypocalcaemia, whereas nonselective VDRAs, and to a lesser extent selective VDRAs, are associated with dose-limiting hypercalcaemia and hyperphosphataemia. Selective VDRAs also have minimal undesirable effects on calcium absorption in the intestine, and calcium and phosphorus mobilisation in the bone compared with nonselective VDRAs. Calcium load in patients with CKD can lead to vascular calcification, accelerated progression of cardiovascular disease and increased mortality. High serum phosphorus levels are also associated with adverse effects on cardiorenal function and survival. Recent evidence suggests that VDRAs are associated with a survival benefit in CKD patients, with a more favourable effect with selective VDRAs than nonselective VDRAs. Paricalcitol, a selective VDRA, is reported to exert specific effects on gene expression in various cell types that are involved in vascular calcification and the development of coronary artery disease. This article examines the molecular mechanisms that determine selectivity of VDRAs, and reviews the evidence for clinical efficacy, safety and survival associated with the three drug classes used for treatment of SHPT in CKD patients.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsHyperparathyroidism, SecondaryAnimalsCalcitriolChronic DiseaseCinacalcetErgocalciferolsHumansHydroxycholecalciferolsKidney DiseasesNaphthalenesReceptors, CalcitriolVitamin D1 alpha-hydroxyergocalciferolalfacalcidolBone Density Conservation AgentsCalcitriolCinacalcetErgocalciferolsHydroxycholecalciferolsNaphthalenesparicalcitolReceptors, CalcitriolVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID17883283
OpenAlexW2088343185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.