Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17882131›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2009

Increasing children's physical activity: a peer modelling, rewards and pedometer-based intervention.

P J Horne, C A Hardman, C F Lowe, A V Rowlands

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01382121 (Increasing Self-efficacy and VO2 Max Scores in Obese Adolescents), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01382121 early_phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

Increasing Self-efficacy and VO2 Max Scores in Obese Adolescents: a Peer Modeling Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Western Ontario, CanadaRan2010 to 2012Enrolled49ConditionsDiabetesArmsPeer Modeling, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Pilot Intervention Using Gamification to Enhance Student Participation in Classroom Activity Breaks.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Physical Activity and Outdoor Play of Children in Public Playgrounds-Do Gender and Social Environment Matter?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

P J HorneSchool of Psychology, University of Wales Bangor, Gwynedd, UK.
C A Hardman
C F Lowe
A V Rowlands

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesTo evaluate a peer modelling, rewards and pedometer-feedback intervention designed to increase children's physical activity and which uses the same behaviour-change principles underlying the Food Dude Healthy Eating Programme. SUBJECTS/

methodsThe study was conducted in two primary schools in Wales. Participants were 47 children (21 boys, 26 girls) from the experimental school and 53 children (29 boys, 24 girls) from a matched control school, aged 9-11 years. Children in the experimental school took part in the intervention; over 8 days they were introduced to fictional role models (the Fit n' Fun Dudes) via visual and audio intervention materials and received small rewards when their daily pedometer step counts increased by 1500 steps per day relative to their baselines. Pedometer measures were taken from children in both schools at baseline, intervention (baseline 2 for the control school) and 12-week follow-up.

resultsAmong experimental girls, steps per day were significantly higher during the intervention (14 686+/-2540) and at follow-up (13 737+/-3288) compared to baseline (10 864+/-2481, P<0.001) and control girls (P<0.005). Experimental boys showed significantly higher daily steps during the intervention compared to baseline (16 237+/-4204 cf. 13 452+/-3258, P<0.001) and control boys (P<0.005). There were no significant differences between activity levels of experimental and control boys at follow-up.

conclusionsThe intervention resulted in substantial increases in children's physical activity, which was well maintained over a 12-week period in girls.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth BehaviorChildFemaleGoalsHealth PromotionHumansMaleMonitoring, AmbulatoryRewardSchoolsWalesWalking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.