Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17880867›Full record

ArticleCurrent psychiatry reports2007

Schizophrenia: from brain morphology to psychopathology.

Adriana Foster, Manzoor Usman, Edna Stirewalt, Peter Buckley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current psychiatry reports, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adriana FosterDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Manzoor Usman
Edna Stirewalt
Peter Buckley

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ten years ago, Velakoulis, the author of a study cited in the present article, was appreciating that the role of functional imaging in schizophrenia research would involve collaboration of clinicians, imaging specialists, and neuropsychologists, and the past year's literature proves his point. Our review shows that structural and functional imaging in schizophrenia is still alive and well. In the past year, it has focused on changes in "at-risk" and first-episode schizophrenia populations and has been used by researchers to characterize phenotypes of patients with schizophrenia prior to including them in genetic research. A decade ago, O'Donovan and Owen were cautiously optimistic about future advances in finding susceptibility genes for schizophrenia, and this year's literature, including their review, proves that the massive efforts of research in the genetics of schizophrenia have started to pay off. An almost-obscure area 10 years ago, pharmacogenetics of schizophrenia is well represented in the past year and gives hope to the practicing clinicians who are eagerly waiting to understand patients' variability in antipsychotic drug response. These and additional areas are included in our review of schizophrenia literature in the past year.

Indexed as

BrainBrain DiseasesChromosome MappingDiagnostic ImagingDominance, CerebralGenetic MarkersGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPharmacogeneticsPhenotypeRisk FactorsSchizophreniaSocial EnvironmentGenetic Markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.