Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17880841›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2007

Complications of anterior compartment vaginal surgery.

Eric S Rovner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eric S RovnerDepartment of Urology, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, CSB 644, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. rovnere@musc.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many complications can be associated with anterior compartment surgery of the vagina. With the integration of synthetic materials into the surgical armamentarium for the repair of stress urinary incontinence in the form of midurethral slings, and for the repair of vaginal prolapse as a primary procedure or to augment an existing repair, the spectrum of complications related to this type of surgery is evolving. Fortunately, these complications are mostly preventable, readily recognized, and/or reversible.

Indexed as

Suburethral SlingsAgedFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexSurgical MeshUrinary Incontinence, StressUterine Prolapse

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.