ReviewCancer science2008
Gene trap mutagenesis in mice: new perspectives and tools in cancer research.
Review in Cancer science, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel method to rescue a lethal phenotype through integration of target gene onto the X-chromosome.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Review
- Uncovering genes required for neuronal morphology by morphology-based gene trap screening with a revertible retrovirus vector.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complete human DNA sequence of the human genome was published in 2004 and we entered the postgenomic era. However, many studies showed that gene function is much more complex than we expected, and that mutation of disease genes does not give any clue for molecular mechanisms for disease development. Since the first report on gene knockout mice in 1989, knockout mice have been shown to be a powerful tool for functional genomics and for the dissection of developmental processes in human diseases. In accordance with this successful application of knockout mice, three major mouse knockout programs are now underway worldwide, to mutate all protein-encoding genes in mouse embryonic stem cells using a combination of gene trapping and gene targeting. We developed the exchangeable gene trap method suitable for large scale mutagenesis in mice. In this method we can produce null mutation and post-insertional modification, enabling replacement of the marker gene with a gene of interest and conditional knockout. We herein discuss the effect of this gene-driven type approach for cancer research, especially for finding the genes that are related to cancer, but are paid little attention in hypothesis-driven cancer research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.