ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2008
Estimating the dielectric constant of the channel protein and pore.
Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Native Function of the Bacterial Ion Channel SthK in a Sparsely Tethered Lipid Bilayer Membrane Architecture.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2023Article
- Molecular Mean-Field Theory of Ionic Solutions: A Poisson-Nernst-Planck-Bikerman Model.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Simulation of Gating Currents of the Shaker K Channel Using a Brownian Model of the Voltage Sensor.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
- A super-Gaussian Poisson-Boltzmann model for electrostatic free energy calculation: smooth dielectric distribution for protein cavities and in both water and vacuum states.Journal of mathematical biology · 2019Article
- Membrane Position Dependency of the pKThe Journal of membrane biology · 2018Article
- Intracellular localization of nanoparticle dimers by chirality reversal.Nature communications · 2017Article
- Computational design of a carbon nanotube fluorofullerene biosensor.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2012Article
- Permeation and block of the Kv1.2 channel examined using brownian and molecular dynamics.Biophysical journal · 2011Article
- Testing the applicability of Nernst-Planck theory in ion channels: comparisons with Brownian dynamics simulations.PloS one · 2011Article
- The ionization state of D37 in E. coli porin OmpF and the nature of conductance fluctuations in D37 mutants.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2010Article
- Synthetic chloride-selective carbon nanotubes examined by using molecular and stochastic dynamics.Biophysical journal · 2010Article
- Ion conduction in ligand-gated ion channels: Brownian dynamics studies of four recent crystal structures.Biophysical journal · 2010Article
- Computational study of the transmembrane domain of the acetylcholine receptor.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2009Article
- Conduction of Na+ and K+ through the NaK channel: molecular and Brownian dynamics studies.Biophysical journal · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When modelling biological ion channels using Brownian dynamics (BD) or Poisson-Nernst-Planck theory, the force encountered by permeant ions is calculated by solving Poisson's equation. Two free parameters needed to solve this equation are the dielectric constant of water in the pore and the dielectric constant of the protein forming the channel. Although these values can in theory be deduced by various methods, they do not give a reliable answer when applied to channel-like geometries that contain charged particles. To determine the appropriate values of the dielectric constants, here we solve the inverse problem. Given the structure of the MthK channel, we attempt to determine the values of the protein and pore dielectric constants that minimize the discrepancies between the experimentally-determined current-voltage curve and the curve obtained from BD simulations. Two different methods have been applied to determine these values. First, we use all possible pairs of the pore dielectric constant of water, ranging from 20 to 80 in steps of 10, and the protein dielectric constant of 2-10 in steps of 2, and compare the simulated results with the experimental values. We find that the best agreement is obtained with experiment when a protein dielectric constant of 2 and a pore water dielectric constant of 60 is used. Second, we employ a learning-based stochastic optimization algorithm to pick out the optimum combination of the two dielectric constants. From the algorithm we obtain an optimum value of 2 for the protein dielectric constant and 64 for the pore dielectric constant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17876574What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.