Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17875405›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pharmacology2007

The continuing challenge of ESBLs.

Federico Perez, Andrea Endimiani, Kristine M Hujer, Robert A Bonomo

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 297 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Antimicrobial resistance profiles ofJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Decreasing trend ofVeterinary and animal science · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Susceptibility of CommensalAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  20. Review

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Federico PerezDivision of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Andrea Endimiani
Kristine M Hujer
Robert A Bonomo
Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center · USUniversity Hospitals Case Medical Center · USUniversity School · US

Funding

Understanding ceftazidime resistance in SHV B-LactamasesR01AI063517 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BONOMO, ROBERT A. · 2005 to 2023
$4.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI063517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since their first description more than 20 years ago, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae possessing extended-spectrum class A beta-lactamases (ESBLs) continue to thwart our best clinical efforts. In the 'early years' the most common beta-lactamases were of the TEM and SHV varieties. Now, CTX-M enzymes are being discovered throughout the world and are becoming the most prevalent beta-lactamases found in clinical isolates. The K. pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPC) (ESBL-type enzymes that confer resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins and carbapenems) present the most significant challenge to date. Structural studies of ESBLs indicate that active site expansion and remodeling are responsible for this extended hydrolytic activity. Continuing questions still exist regarding the optimal detection method for ESBLs. Most relevant are the increasing concerns regarding the status of carbapenems as 'best therapy' for ESBL-producing bacteria in light of the emergence of carbapenemases.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamasesEnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsHumansAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-Lactamases

Identifiers

PMID17875405
PMCPMC2235939
OpenAlexW2071463329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.