Strengthening communities' youth access policies may facilitate clean indoor air action.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Effects of youth tobacco access and possession policy interventions on heavy adolescent smokers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2009
   Trial
2. A randomized trial evaluating tobacco possession-use-purchase laws in the USA.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2008
   Trial
3. A gaping gap (smokeless tobacco control in Pakistan).Tobacco induced diseases · 2016
   Review
4. Cracking Down On Youth Tobacco May Influence Drug Use.Journal of community psychology · 2010
   Article
5. Youth tobacco access and possession policy interventions: effects on observed and perceived tobacco use.The American journal on addictions
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as