Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17875247›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2007

From program to policy: expanding the role of community coalitions.

Anne Hill, Jill Guernsey De Zapien, Lisa K Staten, Deborah Jean McClelland, Rebecca Garza, Martha Moore-Monroy, JoJean Elenes, Victoria Steinfelt, Ila Tittelbaugh, Evelyn Whitmer and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anne HillMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Ave, P.O. Box 245163, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA. abhill@email.arizona.edu
Jill Guernsey De Zapien
Lisa K Staten
Deborah Jean McClelland
Rebecca Garza
Martha Moore-Monroy
JoJean Elenes
Victoria Steinfelt
Ila Tittelbaugh
Evelyn Whitmer
Joel S Meister

Funding

Pilot--Validating self-reported physical activity by Mexican AmericansP60MD000155 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI ROSALES, CECILIA BALLESTEROS · 2003 to 2008
$6.5M
NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD000155NIMHD NIH HHS P60MD000155-03PHS HHS U48-CCU915770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes mortality at the United States-Mexico border is twice the national average. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is increasingly diagnosed among children and adolescents. Fragmented services and scarce resources further restrict access to health care. Increased awareness of the incidence of disease and poor health outcomes became a catalyst for creating community-based coalitions and partnerships with the University of Arizona that focused on diabetes. CONTEXT: Five partnerships between the communities and the University of Arizona were formed to address these health issues. They began with health promotion as their goal and were challenged to add policy and environmental change to their objectives. Understanding the meaning of policy in the community context is the first step in the transition from program to policy. Policy participation brings different groups together, strengthening ties and building trust among community members and community organizations.

methodsData on progress and outcomes were collected from multiple sources. We used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH) 2010 Community Change Model as the capacity-building and analytic framework for supporting and documenting the transition of coalitions from program to policy. CONSEQUENCES: Over 5 years, the coalitions made the transition, in varying degrees, from a programmatic focus to a policy planning and advocacy focus. The coalitions raised community awareness, built community capacity, encouraged a process of "change in change agents," and advocated for community environmental and policy shifts to improve health behaviors.

interpretationThe five coalitions made environmental and policy impacts by engaging in policy advocacy. These outcomes indicate the successful, if not consistently sustained, transition from program to policy. Whether and how these "changes in change agents" are transferable to the larger community over the long term remains to be seen.

Indexed as

Community-Institutional RelationsSocial PlanningArizonaDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Emigration and ImmigrationHealth Care CoalitionsHealth PromotionHispanic or LatinoHumansMexicoOrganizational InnovationPolicy MakingUniversities

Identifiers

PMID17875247
PMCPMC2099268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.