Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17875218›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2007

Scarless and site-directed mutagenesis in Salmonella enteritidis chromosome.

Mandy M Cox, Sherryll L Layton, Tieshan Jiang, Kim Cole, Billy M Hargis, Luc R Berghman, Walter G Bottje, Young Min Kwon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TheVaccines · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Recombineering in Non-Model Bacteria.Current protocols · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Quantitative Tracking ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2017
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Milestones in Candida albicans gene manipulation.Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B · 2011
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mandy M CoxDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA. mmcox@uark.edu
Sherryll L Layton
Tieshan Jiang
Kim Cole
Billy M Hargis
Luc R Berghman
Walter G Bottje
Young Min Kwon
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Arkansas System · US

Funding

Genome scanning for virulence genes in bacteriaR21AI063137 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI KWON, YOUNG MIN · 2005 to 2006
$555k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI063137NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI063137.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA variety of techniques have been described which introduce scarless, site-specific chromosomal mutations. These techniques can be applied to make point mutations or gene deletions as well as insert heterologous DNA into bacterial vectors for vaccine development. Most methods use a multi-step approach that requires cloning and/or designing repeat sequences to facilitate homologous recombination. We have modified previously published techniques to develop a simple, efficient PCR-based method for scarless insertion of DNA into Salmonella enteritidis chromosome.

resultsThe final product of this mutation strategy is the insertion of DNA encoding a foreign epitope into the S. enteritidis genome without the addition of any unwanted sequence. This experiment was performed by a two-step mutation process via PCR fragments, Red recombinase and counter-selection with the I-SceI enzyme site. First, the I-SceI site and kanamycin resistance gene were introduced into the genome of cells expressing Red recombinase enzymes. Next, this sequence was replaced by a chosen insertion sequence. DNA fragments used for recombination were linear PCR products which consisted of the foreign insertion sequence flanked by homologous sequences of the target gene. Described herein is the insertion of a section of the M2e epitope (LM2) of Influenza A virus, a domain of CD154 (CD154s) or a combination of both into the outer membrane protein LamB of S. enteritidis.

conclusionWe have successfully used this method to produce multiple mutants with no antibiotic gene on the genome or extra sequence except those nucleotides required for expression of epitope regions. This method is advantageous over other protocols in that it does not require cloning or creating extra duplicate regions to facilitate homologous recombination, contains a universal construct in which an epitope of choice can be placed to check for cell surface expression, and shows high efficiency when screening for positive mutants. Other opportunities of this mutational strategy include creating attenuated mutants and site-specific, chromosomal deletion mutations. Furthermore, this method should be applicable in other gram-negative bacterial species where Red recombinase enzymes can be functionally expressed.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial ProteinsBase SequenceChickensChromosomes, BacterialImmunoglobulin GModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataMutagenesis, InsertionalMutagenesis, Site-DirectedMutationPolymerase Chain ReactionSalmonella enteritidisSequence AlignmentBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial ProteinsImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID17875218
PMCPMC2096622
OpenAlexW2154738519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.