Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17874122›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2007

Effects of extra load position on energy expenditure in treadmill running.

Arve Vorland Pedersen, Rasmus Stokke, Asgeir Mamen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Rehabilitating Soldiers for Load Carriage Tasks: An International Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  3. International society of sports nutrition position stand: tactical athlete nutrition.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2022
    Article
  4. Soldier Load Carriage, Injuries, Rehabilitation and Physical Conditioning: An International Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arve Vorland PedersenFaculty of Health Education, Sør-Trøndelag University College, Trondheim, Norway. Arve.Pedersen@hist.no
Rasmus Stokke
Asgeir Mamen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was designed to investigate how much running economy would be affected by changing the placement of extra load on running subjects. Twenty-four volunteer college students, 18 males and 6 females between 19 and 25 years ran on a treadmill at three different speeds (6, 8, and 10 km h(-1)). Energy expenditure was measured in O(2 )l min(-1). Subjects were tested under three experimental conditions, presented in random order; a normal (baseline) condition, and two different conditions in which the subjects had to carry extra load. The extra load added 10% to the subjects' body mass, and was placed symmetrically on the subjects' shoulders or around their waists. Loading of the subjects affected running economy negatively in both conditions but more so for the shoulder condition. It is argued that the difference between the conditions is due to the fact that the subjects' balance control deteriorated when their centre of gravity was elevated by adding extra load on their shoulders.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBody WeightExercise TestFemaleHumansMaleOxygen ConsumptionPhysical ExertionRunningWeight-BearingYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.