ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2007
Effect of verapamil on tachycardia-induced early cellular electrical remodeling in rabbit atrium.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Verapamil inhibits Kir2.3 channels by binding to the pore and interfering with PIPNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2023Article
- Cardiomyocyte Ca2+ overload in atrial tachycardia: is blockade of L-type Ca2+ channels a promising approach to prevent electrical remodeling and arrhythmogenesis?Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the effects of a 7-day verapamil pretreatment (VPT, 7.5 mg/kg bodyweight subcutaneously every 12 h) on ionic currents and molecular mechanisms underlying tachycardia-induced early electrical remodeling after 24-h rapid atrial pacing (RAP, 600 bpm) in rabbit atrium. Animals were divided into four groups (n = 6 each group): control (not paced, no verapamil), paced only, verapamil only and verapamil and paced, respectively. VPT doubled ICa,L [7.0 +/- 0.7 pA/pF (control) vs 14.2 +/- 0.6 pA/pF (verapamil only)]. RAP reduced ICa,L by 48% to 3.6 +/- 0.7 pA/pF (paced only). RAP did not affect ICa,L in verapamil-treated animals and averaged 15.3 +/- 0.2 pA/pF (paced and verapamil). RAP resulted in a significant decrease of the expression of the alpha1c subunit (-24.7%) and the beta2A subunit (-13.3%), respectively. VPT led to a similar alteration of subunit expression as RAP ["control" vs "verapamil only", decrease of alpha1c subunit (-25.4%), but no significant change in beta2A subunit expression]. However, after VPT, further diminishment of alpha1c and beta2A subunit expression after rapid atrial pacing was absent. ("verapamil" vs "verapamil and paced", n = 6 both groups). RAP decreased Ito [-45%, 51.5 +/- 3.9 pA/pF (control) vs 26.8 +/- 1.5 pA/pF (paced only)] and was not influenceable by VPT. IK1 was neither affected by RAP nor verapamil pretreatment. Downregulation of alpha1c and beta2A subunit expression and the resulting decay of ICa,L current densities were prevented by verapamil. However, these effects are abolished by multiple other adverse effects of verapamil on atrial electrophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.