Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17873348›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews2007

Wnt signaling, stem cells, and the cellular origin of breast cancer.

Charlotta Lindvall, Wen Bu, Bart O Williams, Yi Li

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review on Natural Agents as Aromatase Inhibitors: Management of Breast Cancer.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Natural Products for the Management and Prevention of Breast Cancer.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Epigenetics in cancer stem cells.Molecular cancer · 2017
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Wls promotes the proliferation of breast cancer cells via Wnt signaling.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotta LindvallLaboratory of Cell Signaling and Carcinogenesis, Van Andel Research Institute, 333 Bostwick NE, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA.
Wen Bu
Bart O Williams
Yi Li
Baylor College of Medicine · USVan Andel Institute · US

Funding

MOUSE MODELS OF HUMAN BREAST CANCERU01CA084243 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ROSEN, JEFFREY MARK · 1999 to 2009
$7.3M
PROGENITOR CELLS AND ONCOGENE TARGETS IN BREAST CANCERR01CA113869 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LI, YI · 2005 to 2009
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA113869NCI NIH HHS U01 CA084243-07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The breast epithelium comprises cells at different stages of differentiation, including stem cells, progenitor cells, and more differentiated epithelial and myoepithelial cells. Wnt signaling plays a critical role in regulating stem/progenitor cells in the mammary gland as well as other tissue compartments. Furthermore, there is strong evidence suggesting that aberrant activation of Wnt signaling induces mammary tumors from stem/progenitor cells, and that Wnt exerts its oncogenic effects through LRP5/6-mediated activation of beta-catenin and mTOR pathways. Recent studies using avian retrovirus-mediated introduction of oncogenes into a small subset of somatic mammary cells suggest that polyoma middle T antigen (PyMT) may also preferentially transform stem/progenitor cells. These observations suggest that stem/progenitor cells in the mammary gland may be especially susceptible to oncogenic transformation. Whether more differentiated cells may also be transformed by particular oncogenes is actively debated; it is presently unclear whether stem cells or differentiated mammary cells are more susceptible to transformation by individual oncogenes. Better stem cell and progenitor cell markers as well as the ability to specifically target oncogenes into different mammary cell types will be needed to determine the spectrum of oncogene transformation for stem cells versus more differentiated cells.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAnimalsAntigens, Polyomavirus Transformingbeta CateninBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCell DifferentiationCell Transformation, NeoplasticEpithelial CellsFemaleHumansLDL-Receptor Related ProteinsLow Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-5Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-6Mammary Glands, AnimalMammary Glands, HumanAntigens, Polyomavirus Transformingbeta CateninBiomarkers, TumorLDL-Receptor Related ProteinsLow Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-5Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-6LRP5 protein, humanLRP6 protein, humanMTOR protein, humanProtein KinasesTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesWnt Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17873348
OpenAlexW2022297771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.