ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
Communication and decision making in cancer care: setting research priorities for decision support/patients' decision aids.
Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02261051 (Symptom Management, Quality of Life and Satisfaction With Care for Advanced Stage Cancers - Control Arm), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Symptom Management, Quality of Life and Satisfaction With Care for Advanced Stage Cancers - Control Arm
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of the Serious Illness Care Program in Outpatient Oncology: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2019Trial
- Development of the Serious Illness Care Program: a randomised controlled trial of a palliative care communication intervention.BMJ open · 2015Trial
- A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2010Trial
- Optimal cancer care: what essential elements of care would help haematological cancer patients obtain and understand information about their disease and its treatment and impact?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018Article
- Palliative medicine and decision science: the critical need for a shared agenda to foster informed patient choice in serious illness.Journal of palliative medicine · 2011Article
- Understanding surgery choices for breast cancer: how might the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Common Sense Model contribute to decision support interventions?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2011Article
- A longitudinal study of organizational formation, innovation adoption, and dissemination activities within the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2010Article
- Patient-provider communication and cancer screening among unmarried women.Patient education and counseling · 2008Article
- Computer-assisted Medical Decision-making System for Diagnosis of Urticaria.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The following is a summary report from a special symposium titled, "Translating Research into Practice: Setting a Research Agenda for Clinical Decision Tools in Cancer Prevention, Early Detection, and Treatment," that was held on 23 October 2005 in San Francisco at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making (SMDM). The symposium was designed to answer the question: "What are the top 2 research priorities in the field of patients' cancer-related decision aids?" After introductory remarks by Dr. Barry, each of four panelists-Drs. Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas, Ellen Peters, Laura Siminoff, and Dale Collins-addressed the question and provided their rationale during prepared remarks. The moderator, Dr. Michael Barry, then facilitated a discussion between the panelists, with input from the audience, to further explore and add to the various proposed research questions. Finally, Dr. Amber Barnato conducted a simple vote count (see Table 1) to prioritize the panelists' and the audience's recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.