Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17873116›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical pathology2007

Epstein Barr virus-associated tumours: an update for the attention of the working pathologist.

H-J Delecluse, R Feederle, B O'Sullivan, P Taniere

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical pathology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Epstein-Barr virus protein BKRF4 restricts nucleosome assembly to suppress host antiviral responses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

H-J DelecluseGerman Research Cancer Centre, Department of Virus Associated Tumours, Heidelberg, Germany. h.delecluse@dkfz.de
R Feederle
B O'Sullivan
P Taniere
German Cancer Research Center · DEUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a herpesvirus associated with approximately 1% of tumours worldwide. EBV is the epitome of B lymphotropic viruses, but the spectrum of tumours it is associated with extends to T lymphocyte and NK cell malignancies, various types of carcinomas and smooth muscle tumours. Ubiquitous EBV infection in humans implies that most individuals carry EBV-infected cells. Therefore, mere detection of the virus in individuals with a tumour is not sufficient for establishing a causal relationship between both events, but instead requires unequivocal detection of viral nucleic acids or viral proteins in the tumour cells. Recent controversies about EBV infection in several carcinomas mainly resulted from such technical issues. The gold standard remains in situ EBER detection, but detection of EBNA1 would be an interesting alternative. EBV detection can be helpful for diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic purposes. The rate of EBV association with entities such as NK/T cell tumours of the nasal type is so high that absence of detection of the virus in such a lesion should cast doubt of the accuracy of the diagnosis. Similarly, diagnosis of EBV-associated follicular pseudo-tumour obviously requires detection of the virus. EBV-positive common gastric adenocarcinomas seem to have a better prognosis than their EBV-negative counterparts and identification of the virus in B cell lymphoproliferations in immunocompromised individuals will guide therapeutic options. In conclusion, EBV-associated tumours are common enough to be relevant for the pathologist in everyday practice, but there is a need to facilitate detection of the virus (eg EBNA1 antibody).

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsHematologic NeoplasmsHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansImmunocompromised HostLymphoproliferative DisordersNeoplasmsRibosomal ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsStomach NeoplasmsRibosomal ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsRPL22 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID17873116
PMCPMC2095566
OpenAlexW2096211231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.