Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17872786›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2007

Room for improvement: patients' experiences of primary care in Quebec before major reforms.

Jeannie L Haggerty, Raynald Pineault, Marie-Dominique Beaulieu, Yvon Brunelle, Josée Gauthier, François Goulet, Jean Rodrigue

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
29.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ten years of the Primary Care Assessment Tool inCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  8. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Validation of a new measure of availability and accommodation of health care that is valid for rural and urban contexts.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Academic family health teams: Part 1: patient perceptions of core primary care domains.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeannie L HaggertyDépartement des Sciences de la santé communautaire, Université Sherbooke, Complexe St-Charles, Bureau 354, tour Est, 1111, rue St-Charles Ouest, Longueuil, QC J4K 5G4. Jeannie.Haggerty@usherbrooke.ca
Raynald Pineault
Marie-Dominique Beaulieu
Yvon Brunelle
Josée Gauthier
François Goulet
Jean Rodrigue

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate variations in accessibility, continuity of care, and coordination of services as experienced by patients in Quebec on the eve of major reforms, and to provide baseline information against which reforms could be measured.

designMultilevel cross-sectional survey of practice.

settingOne hundred primary health care settings were randomly selected in urban, suburban, rural, and remote locations in 5 health regions in Quebec.

participantsIn each clinic, we chose up to 4 physicians and 20 consecutive patients consulting each physician.

main outcome measuresPatients' responses to a self-administered questionnaire, the Primary Care Assessment Tool, that assessed patient-provider affiliation, accessibility, relational continuity, coordination of primary and specialty care, and whether patients received health promotion and preventive services.

resultsA total of 3441 patients participated (87% acceptance rate) in 100 clinics (64% response rate). Timely access was difficult; only 10% expressed confidence they could be seen by their regular doctors within a day if they became suddenly ill. Average waiting time for a doctor's appointment was 24 days. Coordination of care with specialists was at minimally acceptable levels. Patients with family physicians recalled them addressing only 56% of the health promotion and preventive issues appropriate for their age and sex, and patients without family physicians recalled physicians addressing substantially fewer (38%). Most patients reported they were highly confident that their physicians knew them well and would manage their care beyond clinical encounters (relational continuity). The exception was the 16% of patients overall who did not have family physicians (34% of patients at walk-in clinics).

conclusionThis survey highlights serious problems with accessibility. Improvement is needed urgently to avoid deterioration of patients' confidence in the health system even though patients rate their relationships with their physician highly. Health promotion, preventive services, and coordination with specialists also needed to be improved, and careful thought must be given to the plight of those without family physicians.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeContinuity of Patient CareCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Care ReformHealth Care SurveysHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMedicineMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareQuebecRural PopulationSpecialization

Identifiers

PMID17872786
PMCPMC1949223
OpenAlexW1932254149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.