ArticleAtherosclerosis2008
Histological topographical comparisons of atherosclerosis progression in juveniles and young adults.
Article in Atherosclerosis, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Do bisphosphonates and RANKL inhibitors alter the progression of coronary artery calcification? A systematic review.BMJ open · 2024Pooled it
- Coronary atherosclerotic plaque composition and classification in hypercholesterolemic pigs.Atherosclerosis · 2026Article
- Changing topographic Hox expression in blood vessels results in regionally distinct vessel wall remodeling.Biology open · 2012Article
- Atherosclerosis in young Brazilians suffering violent deaths: a pathological study.BMC research notes · 2011Article
- Histological changes and risk factor associations in type 2 atherosclerotic lesions (fatty streaks) in young adults.Atherosclerosis · 2011Article
- Regional heterogeneity within the aorta: relevance to aneurysm disease.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2008Review
- Lipid peroxidation and decomposition--conflicting roles in plaque vulnerability and stability.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe histologically topographic comparisons on atherosclerosis progression among three anatomical sites, mid-thoracic and lower abdominal aorta and left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) were performed using a young population (age 15-34 years) from the Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth (PDAY) study. METHODS AND
resultsThe histological classification based on the American Heart Association grading scheme showed that in the thoracic aorta type 2 lesions (numerous macrophage foam cells with fine particles but no pools of extracellular lipid) appeared in the first 10-year age group, with no significant change in prevalence in the next 10 years. Lesions greater than type 2 were rarely seen in the thoracic aorta. Although type 2 lesions appeared later in the LAD than in the aorta, the lesions within the LAD progressed rapidly to more advanced lesions (types 4 and 5) or atheroma. Lesion development in the abdominal aorta was intermediate to lesion development in the thoracic aorta and the LAD.
conclusionsThe most striking topographic difference on lesion progression among the three anatomical sites was the vulnerability of type 2 lesions to progress into advanced lesions. The histology study, including immunohistochemistry limited to the type 2 lesions suggested that lesion progression was related to the intimal thickness and the amount of collagen but not to the number of macrophage foam cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.