Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17869240›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2007

Redundancy and evolution of GATA factor requirements in development of the myocardium.

Tessa Peterkin, Abigail Gibson, Roger Patient

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Mending a broken heart:Disease models & mechanisms · 2021
    Review
  11. Epigenetic Changes GoverningInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Myocardial plasticity: cardiac development, regeneration and disease.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tessa PeterkinWeatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.
Abigail Gibson
Roger Patient
John Radcliffe Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBVictor Chang Cardiac Research Institute · AU

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U137981013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transcription factors, GATA4, 5 and 6, recognize the same DNA sequence and are all expressed in the developing myocardium. However, knockout studies in the mouse have indicated that none of them are absolutely required for the specification of the myocardium. Here we present evidence for redundancy in this family for the first time. Using morpholinos in both Xenopus and zebrafish embryos, we show that GATA4 knockdown, for example, only affects cardiac marker expression in the absence of either GATA5 or GATA6. A similar situation pertains for GATA5 in Xenopus whereas, in zebrafish, GATA5 (faust) plays a major role in driving the myocardial programme. This requirement for GATA5 in zebrafish is for induction of the myocardium, in contrast to the GATA6 requirement in both species, which is for differentiation. This early role for GATA5 in zebrafish correlates with its earlier expression and with an earlier requirement for BMP signalling, suggesting that a mutual maintenance loop for GATA, BMP and Nkx expression is the evolutionarily conserved entity.

Indexed as

HeartMyocardiumAnimalsCell DifferentiationEmbryonic InductionEmbryo, NonmammalianGATA4 Transcription FactorGATA5 Transcription FactorIn Situ HybridizationMiceMorphogenesisOligonucleotides, AntisenseXenopus laevisXenopus ProteinsZebrafishZebrafish ProteinsGATA4 Transcription FactorGATA5 Transcription FactorOligonucleotides, AntisenseXenopus ProteinsZebrafish Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17869240
PMCPMC2279743
OpenAlexW2039124939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.