Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17867726›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2007

Impact of safety alerts on measures of disproportionality in spontaneous reporting databases: the notoriety bias.

Antoine Pariente, Fleur Gregoire, Annie Fourrier-Reglat, Françoise Haramburu, Nicholas Moore

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 145 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
145citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

145 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 238 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

85 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Antoine ParienteDepartment of Pharmacology, Universite Victor Segalen, Bordeaux, France. Antoine.pariente@pharmaco.u-bordeaux2.fr
Fleur Gregoire
Annie Fourrier-Reglat
Françoise Haramburu
Nicholas Moore
Inserm · FRBordeaux Population Health · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisproportionality analysis of spontaneous reporting is increasingly used, but it may be influenced in unknown ways by safety alerts (notoriety bias).

objectiveTo explore the consequences of safety alerts on reporting disproportionality.

methodsWithin the French national pharmacovigilance database, disproportionality of reporting was tested, using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and its 95% confidence interval, before and after four safety alerts: valvulopathies with pergolide; tuberculosis with infliximab; strokes with atypical antipsychotics; and rhabdomyolysis with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) [after cerivastatin withdrawal].

resultsNo cases of valvulopathy were reported in association with pergolide before the safety alert and 63 cases were reported after the alert, (ROR 9400; 95% CI 4300, 20 000), of which five had occurred before the alert. Twenty-five reports mentioned rhabdomyolysis associated with statins (not including cerivastatin) before the safety alert (ROR 5.8; 95% CI 3.8, 9.0), and 63 did so after the alert (ROR 9.4; 95% CI 7.0, 13.0). Approximately 280 cases involving cerivastatin were reported after its withdrawal. There were two reports of tuberculosis associated with infliximab before the alert (ROR 1500; 95% CI 130, 18 000) and seven after the alert (ROR 430; 95% CI 110, 1700). There was one report of a stroke in association with atypical antipsychotic treatment before the safety alert (ROR 0.10; 95% CI 0.01, 0.63) and 16 after the alert (ROR 1.10; 95% CI 0.70, 1.90). After excluding events involving treatment with anticoagulant agents, the RORs for stroke in association with atypical antipsychotic treatment were 0.14 (95% CI 0.02, 1.00) before the alert and 2.0 (95% CI 1.2, 3.4) after the alert.

conclusionDisproportionality in spontaneous reporting databases increases after a safety alert because of increased reporting of the event of interest, including reports of such events that occurred before the alert. This may overflow to increased reporting of the event in association with other drugs.

Indexed as

PrejudiceAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntipsychotic AgentsAntirheumatic AgentsDatabases, FactualDopamine AgonistsFranceHeart Valve DiseasesHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsInfliximabOdds RatioPergolideProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingRhabdomyolysisAntibodies, MonoclonalAntipsychotic AgentsAntirheumatic AgentsDopamine AgonistsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsInfliximabPergolide

Identifiers

PMID17867726
OpenAlexW2119156782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.