ReviewCancer metastasis reviews1991
Biology of tumors of the peripheral nervous system.
Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-Cell Atlas Reveals Tumorigenic Profiles and Immune Dynamics of Adrenal Incidentalomas.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Central neurocytomas with MIB-1 labeling index over 10% showing rapid tumor growth and dissemination.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2006Article
- Normal human serum contains a natural IgM antibody cytotoxic for human neuroblastoma cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1996Article
- Tumour progression of human neuroblastoma cells tagged with a lacZ marker gene: earliest events at ectopic injection sites.British journal of cancer · 1994Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Tumors of the peripheral nervous system include neuroblastomas, pheochromocytomas, and neuroepitheliomas. Neuroblastomas and pheochromocytomas are adrenergic in origin and share certain genetic features, whereas neuroepitheliomas are thought to be cholinergic and are characterized by distinct genetic features. Neuroblastomas are characterized by deletion of the short arm of chromosome 1 (1p), amplification of the MYCN proto-oncogene, and hyperdiploidy in subsets of tumors. All three of these genetic features have prognostic value in subsets of patients. Allelic loss of 14q also occurs with increased frequency, but the prognostic importance of this abnormality is not known yet. Pheochromocytomas have not been studied as extensively, but allelic loss for 1p appears to be a frequent change, and no clear examples of oncogene activation have been identified to date. Neuroepitheliomas are characterized by translocation between chromosomes 11 and 22. Although they have a characteristic pattern of proto-oncogene expression, it is not clear that any of these oncogenes are activated specifically, and no sites of allelic loss have been identified to date. Thus, cytogenetic and molecular analysis of neuroblastomas, pheochromocytomas, and neuroepitheliomas are useful in distinguishing them from each other and from other tumors in selected cases. Furthermore, certain genetic markers are useful in predicting clinical behavior, especially for neuroblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.